Difference between revisions of "BattleMaster Wiki talk:Style Guide"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (Trying to arrange headings)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
I strongly think it should be <nowiki>[[Link_Style]]</nowiki>. It makes it easier to read, as the two words have some space between them. -- [[User:Nicholas|Nicholas]] July 18, 2005 22:49 (CEST)
 
I strongly think it should be <nowiki>[[Link_Style]]</nowiki>. It makes it easier to read, as the two words have some space between them. -- [[User:Nicholas|Nicholas]] July 18, 2005 22:49 (CEST)
  
=Mood=
+
==Mood==
 
 
 
I think that the wiki should try to avoid using technical vocabulary as it spoils the feel of battlemaster. For example (This is all stolen from [[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]]'s article on [[taxes]]. It's a great article, it just happens to be the only one available to critisize.) instead of "region's gold rating" use "region's  wealth". -- [[User:Nicholas|Nicholas]] July 18, 2005 23:06 (CEST)
 
I think that the wiki should try to avoid using technical vocabulary as it spoils the feel of battlemaster. For example (This is all stolen from [[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]]'s article on [[taxes]]. It's a great article, it just happens to be the only one available to critisize.) instead of "region's gold rating" use "region's  wealth". -- [[User:Nicholas|Nicholas]] July 18, 2005 23:06 (CEST)

Revision as of 23:07, 18 July 2005

Multi Word Links

Which is the better way to name multi-word pages: TwoWords or Two_Words? It would be nice to have a consistent naming scheme for these things. -- Dolohov

I strongly think it should be [[Link_Style]]. It makes it easier to read, as the two words have some space between them. -- Nicholas July 18, 2005 22:49 (CEST)

Mood

I think that the wiki should try to avoid using technical vocabulary as it spoils the feel of battlemaster. For example (This is all stolen from Dolohov's article on taxes. It's a great article, it just happens to be the only one available to critisize.) instead of "region's gold rating" use "region's wealth". -- Nicholas July 18, 2005 23:06 (CEST)