Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Vlaanderen Independent/Article 4"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (spell mistake) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am sorry but that was really the most ridiculous article I've ever read... --[[User:Vlad|Vlad]] 08:14, 31 October 2007 (CET) | I am sorry but that was really the most ridiculous article I've ever read... --[[User:Vlad|Vlad]] 08:14, 31 October 2007 (CET) | ||
+ | :Vlaanderen without the fronenian rebels just doesn't make the cut anymore, what more can you expect of them? ;) -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 17:26, 31 October 2007 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | You make a mockery of [[The Face of Fronen|objective jorunalism]]. I don't find your satire humorous at all. Also, I pity the Khthonians who have been betrayed by a former ally. Hopefully they will take temporary shelter in Fronen as they did during the last invasion. --[[User:Alex|Alex]] 02:32, 4 November 2007 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 03:32, 4 November 2007
I am sorry but that was really the most ridiculous article I've ever read... --Vlad 08:14, 31 October 2007 (CET)
- Vlaanderen without the fronenian rebels just doesn't make the cut anymore, what more can you expect of them? ;) -Chénier 17:26, 31 October 2007 (CET)
You make a mockery of objective jorunalism. I don't find your satire humorous at all. Also, I pity the Khthonians who have been betrayed by a former ally. Hopefully they will take temporary shelter in Fronen as they did during the last invasion. --Alex 02:32, 4 November 2007 (CET)