Talk:Republican/Mar,07/World News: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 19:50, 3 August 2007

Actually, the temple was damaged by looting it BEFORE the takeover, and not after; Amekal was using the faith to combat the kingdom, and so they put a dent in his efforts. Only lords can tear down temples in their realm's lands, and no lord can be appointed in Bolkenia because of the claim.

Revision as of 16:19, 5 March 2007 (view source) Psych Family (talk \| contribs) No edit summary		Latest revision as of 19:50, 3 August 2007 (view source) Chénier (talk \| contribs) m (Talk:Republican/Mar,07/World News\mar moved to Talk:Republican/Mar,07/World News)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Actually, the temple was damaged by looting it BEFORE the takeover; Amekal was using the faith to combat the kingdom. Only lords can tear down temples in their realm's lands, and no lord can be appointed in Bolkenia because of the claim.		Actually, the temple was damaged by looting it BEFORE the takeover, and not after; Amekal was using the faith to combat the kingdom, and so they put a dent in his efforts. Only lords can tear down temples in their realm's lands, and no lord can be appointed in Bolkenia because of the claim.