Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Realms of Atamara"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Foreign Curs (talk | contribs) m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd suggest you put a line between lost realms and existing realms. Now it's kinda guessing which realms belong to chich category if you don't have any historical knowledge about Atamara... [[User:Foreign Curs|Foreign Curs]] 21:02, 15 February 2007 (CET) | I'd suggest you put a line between lost realms and existing realms. Now it's kinda guessing which realms belong to chich category if you don't have any historical knowledge about Atamara... [[User:Foreign Curs|Foreign Curs]] 21:02, 15 February 2007 (CET) | ||
+ | :There is no need. Not only are lost realms ''emphasised'' but the realms are listed in alphabetical order from 'A' after the extant realms - [[User:Revan|Revan]] 21:17, 15 February 2007 (CET) |
Revision as of 22:17, 15 February 2007
I'd suggest you put a line between lost realms and existing realms. Now it's kinda guessing which realms belong to chich category if you don't have any historical knowledge about Atamara... Foreign Curs 21:02, 15 February 2007 (CET)
- There is no need. Not only are lost realms emphasised but the realms are listed in alphabetical order from 'A' after the extant realms - Revan 21:17, 15 February 2007 (CET)