BattleMaster Wiki talk:Style Guide: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Multi Word Links== | |||
==Multi Word== | |||
Which is the better way to name multi-word pages: TwoWords or Two_Words? It would be nice to have a consistent naming scheme for these things. | Which is the better way to name multi-word pages: TwoWords or Two_Words? It would be nice to have a consistent naming scheme for these things. | ||
-- [[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] | -- [[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] | ||
Revision as of 21:07, 18 July 2005
Multi Word Links
Which is the better way to name multi-word pages: TwoWords or Two_Words? It would be nice to have a consistent naming scheme for these things. -- Dolohov
I strongly think it should be [[Link_Style]]. It makes it easier to read, as the two words have some space between them. -- Nicholas July 18, 2005 22:49 (CEST)
Mood
I think that the wiki should try to avoid using technical vocabulary as it spoils the feel of battlemaster. For example (This is all stolen from Dolohov's article on taxes. It's a great article, it just happens to be the only one available to critisize.) instead of "region's gold rating" use "region's wealth". -- Nicholas July 18, 2005 23:06 (CEST)