Difference between revisions of "Talk:Riombaran Herald/Archives/Issue 3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yes, you're very much correct. Thanks for noticing. --[[User:Gryphon|Gryphon]] 13:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | :Yes, you're very much correct. Thanks for noticing. --[[User:Gryphon|Gryphon]] 13:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Can I just saw I LOVE IT that you referred to Duke Carmelo as the "Sunrise Duke"? I assume that was a reference to the Irombrozian title of kingship ("Sunrise King"), and it makes me bounce with happiness at seeing Irombro maintain some of its uniqueness. [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 18:39, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | Can I just saw I LOVE IT that you referred to Duke Carmelo as the "Sunrise Duke"? I assume that was a reference to the Irombrozian title of kingship ("Sunrise King"), and it makes me bounce with happiness at seeing Irombro maintain some of its uniqueness. [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 18:39, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Heh, yep, the Sunrise Duke title is indeed a reference to the Irombrozian customs. I figured it would be nice to preserve as much uniqueness as possible. --[[User:Gryphon|Gryphon]] 20:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:19, 16 April 2010
I think you meant april, and not march? -Chénier 13:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, you're very much correct. Thanks for noticing. --Gryphon 13:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Can I just saw I LOVE IT that you referred to Duke Carmelo as the "Sunrise Duke"? I assume that was a reference to the Irombrozian title of kingship ("Sunrise King"), and it makes me bounce with happiness at seeing Irombro maintain some of its uniqueness. Vellos 18:39, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- Heh, yep, the Sunrise Duke title is indeed a reference to the Irombrozian customs. I figured it would be nice to preserve as much uniqueness as possible. --Gryphon 20:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
