Talk:Itorunt Informer/May '06

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

We attacked them? In TROYES? Well, good thing it said "Attacker Victory" then, eh? So I guess we didn't lose? That's swell. Hynes 03:31, 5 May 2006 (CEST)

Please, Sign your comments. Besides, I wrote that in a hurry. You can tell because theres little mention of the other victories. Besides, I didn't mention that it was Troyes... there are other victories from the Northern realms. But if you prefer to think about Troyes, I have changed the wordibng to reflect it. Happy? --The1exile 23:49, 4 May 2006 (CEST)

Caligus and Perdan lose! and then turn around and beat Yssuckia twice in a row!

And then the general of Caligus doesn't come back to life! And you still aren't signing your comments! --The1exile 14:53, 6 May 2006 (CEST)

Given their recent performance, Yssaria probably did them a favor. They had to have been doing something wrong to lose against smaller forces on such a consistent basis. - Thray Walsh

Oh I know... but this was apparently one of Caligus' better generals. I didn't believe it either... --The1exile 11:20, 7 May 2006 (CEST)

Ooo, and then they won a battle in Supra. Seems they aren't doing so bad after all, hrm? Hynes 15:05, 7 May 2006 (CEST)

One battle won does not change the fact that Caligus is getting their butts kicked. --The1exile 17:30, 8 May 2006 (CEST)

Actually, it was three. Hynes 20:55, 8 May 2006 (CEST)

Fact: Yssaria is still twice as large, currently, as Caligus. Caligus has 2 badlands, a rural, a mountain and a city region, Yssaria has two cities and a load of other regions. It doesn't take a genius to see who's winning. Plus, Caligus lost their general. --The1exile 21:33, 8 May 2006 (CEST)

You and Ibladesh currently have four more regions than Perdan, and we beat you 95% of the time.Hynes 22:31, 8 May 2006 (CEST)


Perdan has an army of ~70K CS in mobile... and a shorter cycle time... and Ubent... Oh yes, Ubent! that would be another 5 regions or so for you! --The1exile 22:42, 8 May 2006 (CEST)


Tournament

Tis a great idea for hopefully we can all find common ground. And hopefully LoF will remain nuetral. - Aurum Bishamon Family 17:43, 9 May 2006 (CEST)

I knew writing with a trader would never work out... Seriously, I need to know when the last tournament was held on EC. I know there hasn't been one in over 6 months. That's an insane idea.

Aurum, keep up the good work with being peaceful. It doesn't hurt that the paper isn't all about winning... which we'll still do anyway, of course. --The1exile 19:02, 9 May 2006 (CEST)

The last Tourney on the EC I remember was when I started out as a noob, which was about 1.5 years ago. (I think) ScottSabin 19:24, 9 May 2006 (CEST)

I tried asking Ryndhal, he said "I can't remember". That's how long ago it must have been. He's been around something like 4 years. --The1exile 19:32, 9 May 2006 (CEST)

The last tournament was held by Ubent I believe, after the rebellion that threw Scyld out. It was sometime around October 2005 maybe. --Neoro 19:57, 9 May 2006 (CEST)

If you think that the tournament is "stupid idea" set up by "some idiot", then why are you going? Personally, I think it's a great idea. Maybe if we can more things like this going, we can bring some of these endless wars to a close. Three cheers for Lycastus! --Indirik 22:17, 9 May 2006 (CEST)

Ahahaha, if LoF remains neutral, just think of all the tournaments! --Kag 23:13, 9 May 2006 (CEST)

Duh, someone has to report on it, and Aurum is a trader, and so he can't go, and I didn't bother asking. Besides, I like stupid ideas! --The1exile 23:23, 9 May 2006 (CEST)

OR Press

Hey, editors of the paper. Mind if you get in touch with me. We might have to write up a little bit of a rivalry to the OCPAU. We could really get this going here. Well, lets just get in touch somehow. leave me a message on the press if you are interested in getting something together. --Unigeris 04:10, 13 May 2006 (CEST)

Glad to hear that you are interested. Care to talk via emial? My email is duthane2000@yahoo.co.uk

Just send me something there with ideas for our own journalistic papers and laws. Anything you can think of. We can really get something going here. --Unigeris 04:10, 13 May 2006 (CEST)

The Battle of Zawr

The commander of Perdan can boast all he wants. The assault on Zawr was more successful than he would admit. Given the casualty reports I have seen, we gave nearly as good as we got. The Itoruntian and Ibladeshian armies had an impact on the field out of all proportion to their numbers and if things are happening as they should a second wave is on it's way. I must assume much, as I am not able to communicate very much due to my injuries, but it is not an illogical assumption. The Perdanse managed a transient victory, but what Blacknight doesn't seem to realize is that not only does it take more than courage and determination to win a battle, it takes more than victory in a single battle to achieve success in the long-term campaign. The Itoruntian and Ibladeshian commanders understand this, which is why the assault went forward despite the disadvantage we were in. This is far from a complete faiure for our armies. - Thray Walsh