Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dwilight Daily/2008/December"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Fixed. I just wrote anonymous in there instead of leaving it blank. Might want to fix the monthly instruction templates Indirik. --[[User:Bishamon Family|Vita Family]] 04:30, 10 December 2008 (CET) | :Fixed. I just wrote anonymous in there instead of leaving it blank. Might want to fix the monthly instruction templates Indirik. --[[User:Bishamon Family|Vita Family]] 04:30, 10 December 2008 (CET) | ||
::You can't just leave them blank, you have to leave them out altogether. If you add the author and/or realm fields and leave the value empty, it is interpreted differently than not having one. I'll see about clarifying the instructions. (I hope that makes sense.) --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 05:39, 10 December 2008 (CET) | ::You can't just leave them blank, you have to leave them out altogether. If you add the author and/or realm fields and leave the value empty, it is interpreted differently than not having one. I'll see about clarifying the instructions. (I hope that makes sense.) --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 05:39, 10 December 2008 (CET) | ||
| + | :::Makes sense now that I see the corrected template. Altered the sample template in the Dec article to imply removing the field entirely rather than just leaving it blank. -[[User:Baatarsaikhan|Baatarsaikhan]] 09:22, 10 December 2008 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:22, 10 December 2008
Anon. seems broken(OOC)
Leaving the author field blank seems to break it and not list the Anonymous properly. Would someone mind taking a look at it and correcting it to the anonymous state?
Thank you. -Baatarsaikhan 03:05, 10 December 2008 (CET)
- Fixed. I just wrote anonymous in there instead of leaving it blank. Might want to fix the monthly instruction templates Indirik. --Vita Family 04:30, 10 December 2008 (CET)
- You can't just leave them blank, you have to leave them out altogether. If you add the author and/or realm fields and leave the value empty, it is interpreted differently than not having one. I'll see about clarifying the instructions. (I hope that makes sense.) --Indirik 05:39, 10 December 2008 (CET)
- Makes sense now that I see the corrected template. Altered the sample template in the Dec article to imply removing the field entirely rather than just leaving it blank. -Baatarsaikhan 09:22, 10 December 2008 (CET)
- You can't just leave them blank, you have to leave them out altogether. If you add the author and/or realm fields and leave the value empty, it is interpreted differently than not having one. I'll see about clarifying the instructions. (I hope that makes sense.) --Indirik 05:39, 10 December 2008 (CET)
