Difference between revisions of "User talk:Vellos/Standard Oaths"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'These are some oaths I came up with after reviewing some available primary source material. They are, in my opinion, both too long and too vague. They need to be shorter and more…') |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
These are some oaths I came up with after reviewing some available primary source material. They are, in my opinion, both too long and too vague. They need to be shorter and more precise, but they need to still leave wiggle-room, and still sound medieval, and still be a real OATH. Criticism welcome. [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 18:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | These are some oaths I came up with after reviewing some available primary source material. They are, in my opinion, both too long and too vague. They need to be shorter and more precise, but they need to still leave wiggle-room, and still sound medieval, and still be a real OATH. Criticism welcome. [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 18:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I don't think these are too long or too vague. In fact, I welcome vagueness for these. The more opportinities there are for misunderstanding, the better it is. [[User:VonGenf|vonGenf]] 20:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:11, 9 June 2010
These are some oaths I came up with after reviewing some available primary source material. They are, in my opinion, both too long and too vague. They need to be shorter and more precise, but they need to still leave wiggle-room, and still sound medieval, and still be a real OATH. Criticism welcome. Vellos 18:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think these are too long or too vague. In fact, I welcome vagueness for these. The more opportinities there are for misunderstanding, the better it is. vonGenf 20:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
