Difference between revisions of "Talk:Caligan Courier/March'06"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Can you atleast get a decend Layout your self then? -[[User:Vlad|Nosferatus]] | Can you atleast get a decend Layout your self then? -[[User:Vlad|Nosferatus]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is a decent layout. So far as I can tell, the split of the first article by the "Caligan Courier" thing is intentional. I like the layout, actually... [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 29 March 2006 14:20 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 14:20, 29 March 2006
I moved all the talk to the Caligan Courier disscussion page. Please dont post comments here, for this is where i shall talk with my editors. Thanks...--Twinblade 22 March 2006 23:10 (CET)
Great article Kamekaze! I added a quote from myself in the end, hope you dont mind...--Twinblade 22 March 2006 23:10 (CET)
Vlad, I apperciate the attempt, the new image looks great in the Caligan Courier But its too big to put into the issues themselves, it becomes a hassel to read the latest issue, plus the TOC messes up the first article. But great pic!--Twinblade 25 March 2006 00:05 (CET)
Can you atleast get a decend Layout your self then? -Nosferatus
It is a decent layout. So far as I can tell, the split of the first article by the "Caligan Courier" thing is intentional. I like the layout, actually... Vellos 29 March 2006 14:20 (CEST)
