Difference between revisions of "Property talk:Located on"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reply to Mister T.) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I frankly don't understand the problem. What's the issue? Check the changes I made to region boxes, why would the same not work for realm infoboxes? --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 22:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | :I frankly don't understand the problem. What's the issue? Check the changes I made to region boxes, why would the same not work for realm infoboxes? --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 22:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::It was an image/formatting issue, I suppose (my not being "with-it" on wiki terminology). <nowiki>[[Located on::[[Keplerstan]]]]</nowiki> returned [[Located on::Keplerstan]] as a displayed link, which looks odd in the realm boxen. <nowiki>[[Population: ####]]</nowiki> worked just fine, displaying just ####, so I was wondering if it was something to do with wikilinks within the property field. However, I understand there's a pipetrick to remedy this now? -[[User:Baatarsaikhan|Baatarsaikhan]] 01:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:24, 6 February 2009
I have this 'orrible feeling that Located on:: breaks the infoboxes, at least when wikilinks are the variable input. Let's see... [[Located on::Keplerstan]] vs. Keplerstan? How do we resolve this? I guess we could go through everything and change realm wikilinks in each realm infobox input to the bare name...but that seems like work to me. :) -Baatarsaikhan 20:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- I frankly don't understand the problem. What's the issue? Check the changes I made to region boxes, why would the same not work for realm infoboxes? --Tom 22:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- It was an image/formatting issue, I suppose (my not being "with-it" on wiki terminology). [[Located on::[[Keplerstan]]]] returned Keplerstan as a displayed link, which looks odd in the realm boxen. [[Population: ####]] worked just fine, displaying just ####, so I was wondering if it was something to do with wikilinks within the property field. However, I understand there's a pipetrick to remedy this now? -Baatarsaikhan 01:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
