Talk:Taselak (SEI)/Tribune/4th Edition

Selective Reporting?

So... a week has passed. We've started another TO of Lesthem, and assaulted Endelee. This deserves no reporting? Perhaps because Taselak has seen no victories?

OOC: Or perhaps because I have outside duties? I'm authoring a technical exam this month and I had to be away for the weekend. Actually, Taselak has had multiple victories over the weekend against Ikalak. --Habap 14:20, 26 February 2007 (CET)

Interestingly, the Toren Herald lacks an article on it also. Perhaps your own paper is so expectant of failures, that announcing another attempt at a takeover isn't even worth reporting in Toren's own paper. I don't see how actions that not even Toren sees as notable should be noted in Taselak's paper. --Habap 15:50, 26 February 2007 (CET)

Vandalism?

Has Taselak stooped down to vandalism? What is this? You're acting like children.

A rogue noble apparently did it. I have posted to the realm that it isn't appropriate. I would expect that our King will put his foot down also. It's a shame that someone would stoop that low. --Habap 23:31, 12 February 2007 (CET)

Judge's Bulletin

(OOC: my other character also had this problem when writing the laws down...) A reminder that the Gods have no longer given us the opportunity to draw blood, we must fight until we surrender or until a death occurs (duel)! --Jezralhm 09:18, 3 February 2007 (CET)

(OOC: Though I knew the rules had changed, the law hadn't so I put it up the way it was written.) --Habap 14:52, 3 February 2007 (CET)

(OOC: Aight, personally my quoting style is much more invasive.) --Jezralhm 20:37, 3 February 2007 (CET)

New Layout

I like the new layout. But, can you move the papers so the latest edition is the first page instead of the overview, and then have links to the older editions? Mischa 03:12, 4 February 2007 (CET)