Talk:Tara Times/Archive History/January 2007 Issue

Is this actually going to have news on it? Why create a page without any content? AlexTurner 4 October 2005 23:02 (CEST)

Refreshing

It's nice to see other newspapers devout to truth and not spreading their opinions. Jezralhm 05:56, 29 January 2007 (CET)

Thank you for the compliment. We may add an editorial soon though so it may not be unbiased for long. --Rojo 02:50, 1 February 2007 (CET)

At least you're calling it an editorial Rojo. Whereas, RedSpan Revealer and Abington First report under the guise of news. -Jezralhm 11:40, 1 February 2007 (CET)

Don't forget the "Volcanic Hot Newsletter." Oh, wait - they too, report nothing but the unvarnished, whole truth. I keep forgetting how things work in your laughably delusional "Darka can do no wrong" mind-set. House Olik 20:33, 1 February 2007 (CET)

Hail Olik. It seems no opinion contrary to yours can be expressed without your retort. I am somewhat surprised, but I suppose it was to be expected. - Jezralhm 10:29, 2 February 2007 (CET)

The editorial section below is for newspaper staff only. If you wish to respond to an editorial make a new sub heading. Thank you.--Rojo 04:36, 1 February 2007 (CET)

Editorial

Actually this Talk page editorial may not work the way I had planned. I may just create a separate page and link it to the newspaper. It could get really complicated, I didn't personally set up this newspaper so I don't really want to fiddle too much. Anyone got any advice? --Rojo 19:26, 1 February 2007 (CET)

Make a new page for editorials, talk pages are not for this, they're for mindless insults, criticism and the like. - Jezralhm 10:29, 2 February 2007 (CET)