Talk:Fontan (Realm)/Codex
Please post your opinions below:
Ideas for the constitution:
The Magna Carta (Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_Carta, British Library: http://www.bl.uk/treasures/magnacarta/translation.html) would be a good place to start and get ideas from for the constition, since it was originally written in 1215. Just a thought to those who are thinking of doing this.
I'd love to help, but I'm currently trying to get through my last semester of college. And in hopes of making it through my last semester, I don't have time for this, sadly. Maybe in a month I'll be able to contribute something. -Marcus Bates (Viam Videre)
- Shouldn't this be at Fontan/Constitution? --The1exile 13:58, 12 April 2007 (CEST)
- We'll move it there once it has been written. For the moment it better not be contained in a sub-directory for the sake of ingame linking. -- Gsklee 22:23, 12 April 2007 (CEST)
Ok, we have to be simple, starting with the rights of the nobles, after that we say what the nobles have to do their obligations, after that we may say what is need to be a a noble...who are a noble.... what they have to have or done to be able to run for some positions
and after that we may list some crimes and their punishment..
what you think?
we may read the romam law, and greek birth of the State-Cities
this could help us to...
Roman law meets viking meets battlemaster:
http://wiki.battlemaster.org/index.php/Melhed/Laws
You should find this helpful. We are also available for consultation. :) --Dalakar 19:29, 12 April 2007 (CEST)
- Well, not bad! Thanks for that =) -- Gsklee 22:30, 12 April 2007 (CEST)
Question on Article 2: Indirect, Direct, Deliberative, Demarchy, Grassroots, etc. Democracy? Lots of options, maybe you should choose one finally.
- This article's trying to address on the government system the realm should be sticking with. What you mentioned will more likely have to be covered in later articles which detailing more into what the game mechanism doesn't automatically offer but have to be manually established.
Question on Article 4: It essentially indicates that Fontan does not recognize the nobility of any foreign power that they are in conflict with. In and of itself this is of no surprise considering past actions, but to put it on paper is rather, bold.--Dalakar 02:00, 11 May 2007 (CEST)
- It still subjects to further establishment in the Statutum. -- Gsklee 13:39, 11 May 2007 (CEST)
