Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Blood Cult/Myths/Lake Salaman"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: For the Xelatl, the domain of fire belongs to Xeatoatl. Perhaps this should be rewritten with that in mind? --~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For the Xelatl, the domain of fire belongs to Xeatoatl. Perhaps this should be rewritten with that in mind? --[[User:Bannable|Bannable]] 21:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | For the Xelatl, the domain of fire belongs to Xeatoatl. Perhaps this should be rewritten with that in mind? --[[User:Bannable|Bannable]] 21:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Nothing wrong with new gods, and domains aren't exclusive. Makes me think we could expand cultist mythology to include demi-god-like beings and creatures or other such mythical creatures, other than the standard monsters and undead, that is. I kinda like it as is, and think it'd be better to write new lore to explain the differences with the other myths than to simply limit ourselves to a small and very specific mold. Mesoamerican mythology was rich in inconsistencies, anyways. ;) -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 01:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:50, 28 January 2010
For the Xelatl, the domain of fire belongs to Xeatoatl. Perhaps this should be rewritten with that in mind? --Bannable 21:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with new gods, and domains aren't exclusive. Makes me think we could expand cultist mythology to include demi-god-like beings and creatures or other such mythical creatures, other than the standard monsters and undead, that is. I kinda like it as is, and think it'd be better to write new lore to explain the differences with the other myths than to simply limit ourselves to a small and very specific mold. Mesoamerican mythology was rich in inconsistencies, anyways. ;) -Chénier 01:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
