Difference between revisions of "Talk:Republic of Fwuvoghor"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 64: Line 64:
 
::::Face it Chenier... You r behind the times. I am vindicated. [[User:Ceorl|Ceorl]] 04:46, 9 March 2008 (CET)
 
::::Face it Chenier... You r behind the times. I am vindicated. [[User:Ceorl|Ceorl]] 04:46, 9 March 2008 (CET)
 
:::::Face it, it only happened today, and not in February as you were claiming it would. -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 06:21, 9 March 2008 (CET)
 
:::::Face it, it only happened today, and not in February as you were claiming it would. -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 06:21, 9 March 2008 (CET)
 +
::::::Face it, NO U. Seriously, this is childish. Stop. --[[User:Bannable|Bannable]] 02:10, 10 March 2008 (CET)

Revision as of 03:10, 10 March 2008

Irombrozia. Scroll down. We have a Bill of Rights. :D Written by yours truly, Grand Justiciar of Irombrozia. Vellos 02:19, 5 September 2006 (CEST)


Okay, not saying I created the *only* one, but that few have them. --jupo 02:58, 5 September 2006 (CEST)

You said you were, "unique". ;) That implies only, I believe. Vellos 04:05, 6 September 2006 (CEST)

Is it known Retravic will set up a monarchy? Vellos 22:57, 26 March 2007 (CEST)

Yes. And if it's not 100% concrete, then she can change it if she wins. It's definitely known that her aim, or at least that of the rebels in general, is a constitutional monarchy. --The1exile 17:20, 28 March 2007 (CEST)

I like the “people’s republic” idea, the old declarations and codes remain but we are now a monarchy. Perhaps we can expand on this and keep the House of ministers as well. It could lead to some interesting in realm politics.-- TedBauer 12:09 10th of July 2007

people's republic - Like the People's Republic of China? --The1exile 16:30, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

Yes, actually. --Bannable 19:04, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

In Essence retravic is Emperor, she is the de facto ruler of a republic -- TedBauer 17:07 10th of July 2007

Don't be silly people! This is the People's Democratic Republican Queendom of Fwuvoghor. Still haven't figured out where to put "Constitutionnal"... -Chénier 17:53, 10 July 2007 (CEST)
Please stop.--Bannable 19:04, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

when Retravic came to the throne she was doing it to save the republic (from the in realm fighting ;) ). In her manifesto she promised to return Fwuvoghor to a republic after either her death or the end of the war. Really the republic has a Temporary Dictator or Lord Protector. TedBauer 18:50 10th of July 2007

I don't recall ever saying that, do you have a copy of that? --Bannable 19:04, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

No I don't but you called referendum which was voted on by the realm that is what i was refering to.---TedBauer 21:15 10th of July 2007

when Retravic came to the throne she was doing it to save the republic (from the in realm fighting ;) )

D'you know, that could have been done so much easier if she'd actually left instead of using the rebellion to install her preferred government system. And thousands of Fwuvoghorian citizens would still be alive if so. --Widfara, the last Prime Minister.

Why would the only remaining founding member of the realm leave? Its much easier to just exert that reputation.
And thousands of Fwuvoghorian citizens would still be alive if so.
Ah, yes, but they would be under Widfara's will, which was contrary to the established beliefs of the realm. --Bannable 22:53, 10 July 2007 (CEST)
Where monarchy is not contrary to the republican beliefs of the realm... never mind that you consider the beliefs of the realm more important than Tor knows how many lives.... Face it Retravic this is a power trip for you and nothing more. I don't mind that you did it, merely that you try to pretend it was anything different. Widfara
Not at all, Widfara. There is no oppression. All who come as friends are welcome. All religions are accepted within our borders. The form in which the beliefs are enforced has changed, but that is it. The more stable monarchy was choosen so that those who know those beliefs best can serve the Republic for as long as possible, to ensure they are not forgotten. Retravic
So...you had to destroy Dirrik's ideals to save them? --Anaris 15:01, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
No such thing took place. Retravic
Gentlemen, please, can't you give my wife a break? She did as she thought best, she had the support of a substantial part of the realm, and there haven't been any rebellions or insurgencies since... I'm not even aware of any heated opposition going on in RoF... since it become a monarchy it has had more internal peace, harmony, unity, and brotherhood than ever before. A republic has the power to vote it'sown demise: and that voting can only be done on the battlefield. Vellos 21:07, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

I agree Retravic had my support then and has had it ever since, I was thinking that now that we have put much of those problems behind us it is time to bring some of the old ways back into the peoples republic like bring back the House of Ministers for instance. – --TedBauer 21:49, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Incase anyone was ignoring the obvious, The mayor thing retravic changed, was the destruction of RoF's wall, the annialation of its milita and the killing of over half the city's population. If Wildfara was allowed to stay as a ruler, the ECA wouldn't have attacked the city. And then you might have been able to fight of that Deamon army that sack your city recently. So while you might have a better internal regulation, in th end you got screwed when you let this rebbelion happen..--Pelgrims 23:12, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Bull

Do we want this page without bias, because that's bull.

  • Influential to elected: The election process was total crap, and there was little democractic about it. For one, Jean-Olivier was not elected. After one of his uprages, Felmoure misunderstood him and thought he wanted in on the House, to which he complied, though that was never JO's intention. The nobles who got there were indeed the influential nobles of the realm.
  • There was a lot of opposition to these aggressive moves, especially from the newly elected Arch-Priest, Mordred: Mordred was the *only* opposition. Even Ben's, the most voiceful (though constructive) critic, everyone was sympathetic to the cause. Everyone but Mordred remembered the beatings back in the days. There were a few doubts at first, but they were among the lies of "will Rampaging trick us and abandon us after we declare?", and they died down pretty quickly. JO wasn't liked, but he also wasn't opposed, except by Mordred. Ben's critics were hardly opposition. -Chénier 16:51, 20 January 2008 (CET)


Didn't see any announcement of any official name change... The official documents still say "Kingdom of Fwuvoghor". -Chénier 03:37, 5 March 2008 (CET)

Face it ;) The Cheniers are behid on the times :P
Face it, your reform failed. The new months' there, and you still aren't ruler, and we are still being greeted in the "Kingdom of Fwuvoghor". It's you who is behind on times, the realm hasn't had that as an official name since Widfara. -Chénier 05:07, 5 March 2008 (CET)
Face it Chenier... You r behind the times. I am vindicated. Ceorl 04:46, 9 March 2008 (CET)
Face it, it only happened today, and not in February as you were claiming it would. -Chénier 06:21, 9 March 2008 (CET)
Face it, NO U. Seriously, this is childish. Stop. --Bannable 02:10, 10 March 2008 (CET)