Difference between revisions of "Talk:Repository of Knowledge"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::I don't even think they are really useful. A summary would be much better. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 15:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC) | :::I don't even think they are really useful. A summary would be much better. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 15:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::IMO, there should be a separate page archiving all the huge battle reports. At least, for the summaries. Detailed ones are useful for short-term analysis, but not much for archives. -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 00:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | ::::IMO, there should be a separate page archiving all the huge battle reports. At least, for the summaries. Detailed ones are useful for short-term analysis, but not much for archives. -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 00:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::Any particular reason to delete [[User:Haerthorne|Aerywyn]]'s last contribution to this discussion? |
Revision as of 05:27, 15 June 2010
It would be incredible if this would not just contain cut&paste data from the game messages, but a bit of editing. For example, the battle reports can be summarized, a short (1-2 sentences) summary of daily events would give a much better picture of what is happening than the battle reports (for example, not everyone knows the map by heart and where each region is located). --Tom 07:16, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll try to give the battles a summary. I've also started writing a few paragraphs at the top of the page about what they have been doing so far. Ceorl 07:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC)