Difference between revisions of "Talk:Realm Pages"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(forgot my sig...again! :|) |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Yup, Portion is indeed a Lost Realm. I thought it would make it Clearer that way :) --[[User:Revan|Revan]] August 7, 2005 02:37 (CEST) | ::Yup, Portion is indeed a Lost Realm. I thought it would make it Clearer that way :) --[[User:Revan|Revan]] August 7, 2005 02:37 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh yeah, alphebetizing... Any particular reason for ditching the italics? --[[User:Dolohov|John]] 7 August 2005 02:51 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 02:51, 7 August 2005
I got to thinking that putting realms underneath each other for each continent is going to make this page waaay too long once were all done and leave a hell of alot of white space to the side. It didnt seem as bad on the old tiki...
So I just tried out a table for Atamara, and it doesnt look to bad. It's easy to add a realm to if you need to. It seems to look a little more organised and fills up the width of the page more aswell. Anyone have any thoughts on this? --Revan August 7, 2005 02:18 (CEST)
- I like all the changes. Am I to assume that Portion (being italicised) is a Lost Realm? I like that stylistic note. I'll make those changes across the board and see how it looks. --John 7 August 2005 02:26 (CEST)
- Yup, Portion is indeed a Lost Realm. I thought it would make it Clearer that way :) --Revan August 7, 2005 02:37 (CEST)
Oh yeah, alphebetizing... Any particular reason for ditching the italics? --John 7 August 2005 02:51 (CEST)
