Difference between revisions of "Talk:Paisly"
Vecchioratto (talk | contribs) (→:O) |
(→:O) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
i hope is not my banner the prob :) is the info in the page? i saw a lot of page who need refresh or to be completly rebuild... --[[User:Vecchioratto|Vecchioratto]] 17:43, 10 December 2010 (CET) | i hope is not my banner the prob :) is the info in the page? i saw a lot of page who need refresh or to be completly rebuild... --[[User:Vecchioratto|Vecchioratto]] 17:43, 10 December 2010 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The text. All of it is awfully outdated and now wrong. Your banner just made this pop up on my watchlist for me to notice. -[[User:Chénier|Dominic "Chénier"]] 17:58, 11 December 2010 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 18:58, 11 December 2010
Alignment
I had some troubles trying to get certain portions of the text left-aligned, so I had to end up using paragraph tags. I'd rather do an indented list or something, but I think the center tag in the Region Description section of the template might be overriding any other alignment tags. --Ignatius 01:25, 4 November 2008 (CET)
- albert was the 1st duke of paisly. after all.. he seceded from madina to form melodia... oh.. and then he picked a different city to be duke of (port raviel i think). aside from that.. for details you'll have to ask someone else.--Fodder 19:51, 4 November 2008 (CET)
Horrible Design
Is there some particular reason this region uses a very... well... ugly page design? The clashing, vivid colors used for no discernible reason make it look very haphazard and unorganized. Given the fact that this is a rogue region, and not part of any realm, it should use a general regional template, similar to that used by most other regions. --Indirik 17:57, 1 December 2008 (CET)
regional banner
i made the regional banner for Paisly duchy, i have add in paisland... if local lord want i will add here too. --VecchioRatto 12:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
:O
So... horribly... outdated... -Dominic "Chénier" 17:40, 10 December 2010 (CET)
i hope is not my banner the prob :) is the info in the page? i saw a lot of page who need refresh or to be completly rebuild... --Vecchioratto 17:43, 10 December 2010 (CET)
The text. All of it is awfully outdated and now wrong. Your banner just made this pop up on my watchlist for me to notice. -Dominic "Chénier" 17:58, 11 December 2010 (CET)
