Difference between revisions of "Talk:Old Rancagua"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ScottSabin (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::It should be under a new article like [[Perdan/Crisis_2003-10|Perdan Crisis]]; perhaps [[Old Rancagua/March 2006 Rebellion|Old Rancagua March 2006 Rebellion]]. -- [[User:Gsklee|Gsklee]] 18 March 2006 15:04 (CET) | :::It should be under a new article like [[Perdan/Crisis_2003-10|Perdan Crisis]]; perhaps [[Old Rancagua/March 2006 Rebellion|Old Rancagua March 2006 Rebellion]]. -- [[User:Gsklee|Gsklee]] 18 March 2006 15:04 (CET) | ||
::::True. Although it would be "Operation Rubber Ducky". Thats its name. Gotta love those benign names... lol :D [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 18 March 2006 15:07 (CET) | ::::True. Although it would be "Operation Rubber Ducky". Thats its name. Gotta love those benign names... lol :D [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 18 March 2006 15:07 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'll get on to it. [[User:ScottSabin|ScottSabin]] 18 March 2006 15:34 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:34, 18 March 2006
You might want to update this! Perhaps make this "Elder Old Rancagua", and make a new page for "Younger Old Rancagua", lol. Vellos 18 March 2006 13:54 (CET)
- We all know that the counter-rebellion will succeed in no time soon, mister. -- Gsklee 18 March 2006 14:45 (CET)
- Okay. Still, with Charger as ruler, wouldnt it be just to put one of his statements on there under the testimonies? ;) Vellos 18 March 2006 14:57 (CET)
- It should be under a new article like Perdan Crisis; perhaps Old Rancagua March 2006 Rebellion. -- Gsklee 18 March 2006 15:04 (CET)
- True. Although it would be "Operation Rubber Ducky". Thats its name. Gotta love those benign names... lol :D Vellos 18 March 2006 15:07 (CET)
- It should be under a new article like Perdan Crisis; perhaps Old Rancagua March 2006 Rebellion. -- Gsklee 18 March 2006 15:04 (CET)
- Okay. Still, with Charger as ruler, wouldnt it be just to put one of his statements on there under the testimonies? ;) Vellos 18 March 2006 14:57 (CET)
I'll get on to it. ScottSabin 18 March 2006 15:34 (CET)
