Difference between revisions of "Talk:Morale"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Maybe I'm just stubborn, but I like my version better. I think that disambiguation pages really ought to be more informative than Wikipedia's. --[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 22 July 2005 18:41 (CEST) | :::Maybe I'm just stubborn, but I like my version better. I think that disambiguation pages really ought to be more informative than Wikipedia's. --[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 22 July 2005 18:41 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::The idea is that ''no one should end up on a disambiguation page''. It means that the link there should be changed to point to one of the two real pages. Therefore, there is not much point in making it very long. -- [[User:Nicholas|Nicholas]] July 22, 2005 19:01 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 19:01, 22 July 2005
Hm, this isn't a disambiguation page, is it? At least on wikipedia, a disambiguation page contains no actual content and only links to the other pages. I do like this page the way it is. It just isn't a disambiguation page. Maybe the overview at the start should clarify that there are two different morale values and that's it. --Tom 22 July 2005 14:10 (CEST)
- OK, I'll try that and see how it looks. --Dolohov 22 July 2005 18:11 (CEST)
- Take a look at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elk -- Nicholas July 22, 2005 18:36 (CEST)
- Maybe I'm just stubborn, but I like my version better. I think that disambiguation pages really ought to be more informative than Wikipedia's. --Dolohov 22 July 2005 18:41 (CEST)
- The idea is that no one should end up on a disambiguation page. It means that the link there should be changed to point to one of the two real pages. Therefore, there is not much point in making it very long. -- Nicholas July 22, 2005 19:01 (CEST)
