Difference between revisions of "Talk:Minas Ithil Messenger/July 06"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
House Olik (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The violation of the treaty was the end of war treaty (surrender) that ASI signed with Abington. Primarily written by Abington, and equally violated too in the months thereafter. ASI finally reached a boiling point a few months ago when their bankers stated to "Openly steal from ASI so Abington can be fed. Abington must eat, no matter the cost." Then there were murmors that Abington could get away with any other violations because "ASI couldn't do anything about it." ASI decided it was enough...presented her evidence to the EA, and was accepted as a clear violation of the agreement. ASI is no longer bound by that sham of diplomacy, and now sets out to execute Justice. We are grateful that MI has entered this war, and hope she does well down in the South again. DRP [[Primus Family|Primus Family]] | The violation of the treaty was the end of war treaty (surrender) that ASI signed with Abington. Primarily written by Abington, and equally violated too in the months thereafter. ASI finally reached a boiling point a few months ago when their bankers stated to "Openly steal from ASI so Abington can be fed. Abington must eat, no matter the cost." Then there were murmors that Abington could get away with any other violations because "ASI couldn't do anything about it." ASI decided it was enough...presented her evidence to the EA, and was accepted as a clear violation of the agreement. ASI is no longer bound by that sham of diplomacy, and now sets out to execute Justice. We are grateful that MI has entered this war, and hope she does well down in the South again. DRP [[Primus Family|Primus Family]] | ||
:ASI violated the treaty as well. Do not play the innocent victim card, Doc. It doesn't work when you're trying to justify a war of aggression to fulfil your endless greed. I doubt you can even produce the text of that treaty or cite which clauses were violated! [[User:House Olik|Olik]] 20:51, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | :ASI violated the treaty as well. Do not play the innocent victim card, Doc. It doesn't work when you're trying to justify a war of aggression to fulfil your endless greed. I doubt you can even produce the text of that treaty or cite which clauses were violated! [[User:House Olik|Olik]] 20:51, 19 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
| + | :Exactly.. ASI is NOT the victim here, by any means whatsoever. ASI infiltrators have been doing deeds and spying and whatnot in Abington lands, as well as I'm sure mini raids of blackmarketeering in the north of the Islands hoping we wouldn't notice. Also, if you're saying that Abington attacked ASI many times during the Treaty then you are insane. Abington tends to get the most new nobles and not all of them are responsible or attentive people. They are new nobles who don't know what the map looks like, much less where to FIND said map, so they know where not to go (or to have knowledge there even ARE restricted areas (other kingdoms) they aren't supposed to go). Accusing Abington for those new nobles going off into ASI lands when they shouldn't, especially when we punish them for doing so, is like accusing the rain for getting you wet... it just happens, so get off your high horse about the matter and stop making this an "ASI is innocent, Abington is guilty", because the only thing Abington is truly guilty of is not souring the minds of other kingdoms against ASI and manipulating good people into evil decisions, just because it benefits ASI or the Primus Family Ego that they pulled it off. | ||
Revision as of 00:22, 20 July 2006
The violation of the treaty was the end of war treaty (surrender) that ASI signed with Abington. Primarily written by Abington, and equally violated too in the months thereafter. ASI finally reached a boiling point a few months ago when their bankers stated to "Openly steal from ASI so Abington can be fed. Abington must eat, no matter the cost." Then there were murmors that Abington could get away with any other violations because "ASI couldn't do anything about it." ASI decided it was enough...presented her evidence to the EA, and was accepted as a clear violation of the agreement. ASI is no longer bound by that sham of diplomacy, and now sets out to execute Justice. We are grateful that MI has entered this war, and hope she does well down in the South again. DRP Primus Family
- ASI violated the treaty as well. Do not play the innocent victim card, Doc. It doesn't work when you're trying to justify a war of aggression to fulfil your endless greed. I doubt you can even produce the text of that treaty or cite which clauses were violated! Olik 20:51, 19 July 2006 (CEST)
- Exactly.. ASI is NOT the victim here, by any means whatsoever. ASI infiltrators have been doing deeds and spying and whatnot in Abington lands, as well as I'm sure mini raids of blackmarketeering in the north of the Islands hoping we wouldn't notice. Also, if you're saying that Abington attacked ASI many times during the Treaty then you are insane. Abington tends to get the most new nobles and not all of them are responsible or attentive people. They are new nobles who don't know what the map looks like, much less where to FIND said map, so they know where not to go (or to have knowledge there even ARE restricted areas (other kingdoms) they aren't supposed to go). Accusing Abington for those new nobles going off into ASI lands when they shouldn't, especially when we punish them for doing so, is like accusing the rain for getting you wet... it just happens, so get off your high horse about the matter and stop making this an "ASI is innocent, Abington is guilty", because the only thing Abington is truly guilty of is not souring the minds of other kingdoms against ASI and manipulating good people into evil decisions, just because it benefits ASI or the Primus Family Ego that they pulled it off.
