Difference between revisions of "Talk:Itorunt Informer/Special Issue 3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Thray Walsh (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Aurum, while I appreciate your plans for peace, perhaps you could wait and see some plans be enacted. I have my own plans that entail slightly more than just asking the other realms to give up their regions. --[[User:The1exile|The1exile]] 29 April 2006 10:29 (CEST) | + | Aurum, while I appreciate your plans for peace, perhaps you could wait and see some plans be enacted. I have my own plans that entail slightly more than just asking the other realms to give up their regions. --[[User:The1exile|The1exile]] 29 April 2006 10:29 (CEST) |
| + | |||
| + | In the case of Avamar, there is no reason Perdan should give it's territiory to revive a failed realm. Perdan re-establishing Avamar in Aix duchy doesn't make any more sense than Itorunt giving up Xavax duchy or Sirion just giving back Avamar itself. Or they could just take the Kalmar Islands. - Thray Walsh | ||
Revision as of 20:10, 29 April 2006
Aurum, while I appreciate your plans for peace, perhaps you could wait and see some plans be enacted. I have my own plans that entail slightly more than just asking the other realms to give up their regions. --The1exile 29 April 2006 10:29 (CEST)
In the case of Avamar, there is no reason Perdan should give it's territiory to revive a failed realm. Perdan re-establishing Avamar in Aix duchy doesn't make any more sense than Itorunt giving up Xavax duchy or Sirion just giving back Avamar itself. Or they could just take the Kalmar Islands. - Thray Walsh
