Difference between revisions of "Talk:Holos/Apocryphon of Senex"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Naturally, '''you'd''' be the one to recognize something that obscure ;-) --[[User:Danaris|Anaris]] 19:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | :Naturally, '''you'd''' be the one to recognize something that obscure ;-) --[[User:Danaris|Anaris]] 19:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Oh c'mon, Gnosticism isn't really '''that''' obscure. The Gospel of Thomas is practically mainstream these days. [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 20:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ::Oh c'mon, Gnosticism isn't really '''that''' obscure. The Gospel of Thomas is practically mainstream these days. [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 20:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :At least people can pronounce my religion. So there. --[[User:Squirrel|Squirrel]] 20:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:30, 19 March 2010
lol, really? C'mon... can't you at least change it a little bit from the original? Vellos 17:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Naturally, you'd be the one to recognize something that obscure ;-) --Anaris 19:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oh c'mon, Gnosticism isn't really that obscure. The Gospel of Thomas is practically mainstream these days. Vellos 20:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- At least people can pronounce my religion. So there. --Squirrel 20:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
