Difference between revisions of "Talk:Community Manager"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I would say wiki) |
m |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Excellent idea, but would it be placed on this wiki, or some sort of list? I guess it'll be wiki, but won't it be difficult to communicate that way? 'Cause everyone can just edit a page etc. --[[User:Wimpie|Wimpie]] 18:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | Excellent idea, but would it be placed on this wiki, or some sort of list? I guess it'll be wiki, but won't it be difficult to communicate that way? 'Cause everyone can just edit a page etc. --[[User:Wimpie|Wimpie]] 18:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I would say wiki, because it's easier to organize and browse. It's true that any user can edit a page but the wiki does keep a record of edits. If the page gets messed up, the CM can figure it out pretty quick and fix it. --[[User:Squirrel|Squirrel]] 17:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | :I would say wiki, because it's easier to organize and browse. It's true that any user can edit a page but the wiki does keep a record of edits. If the page gets messed up, the CM can figure it out pretty quick and fix it. --[[User:Squirrel|Squirrel]] 17:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::True, and those that mess it up can be banned or something? If it was on purpose I guess.. Anyway that's not the main concern. A list gets you a lot of emails, which basicly is my reason (+not enough time) not to subscribe to the d-list. I see the Community Manager more like a forum than a d-list like concept anyway... --[[User:Wimpie|Wimpie]] 19:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:39, 2 July 2009
Sounds like an excellent idea to me...Do we have any volunteers for the position?
Small Team?
I think that this project would lend itself very well to a team of 2 or 3 people. Definitely one lead Manager and perhaps one or two assistants/deputies. --Indirik 02:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Much like we discussed on the dev list already. I made the decision to have one community manager, because the position needs a "face", but he should have 1-2 people who support him and help out when he's on holiday, etc. --Tom 15:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Wiki or list?
Excellent idea, but would it be placed on this wiki, or some sort of list? I guess it'll be wiki, but won't it be difficult to communicate that way? 'Cause everyone can just edit a page etc. --Wimpie 18:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- I would say wiki, because it's easier to organize and browse. It's true that any user can edit a page but the wiki does keep a record of edits. If the page gets messed up, the CM can figure it out pretty quick and fix it. --Squirrel 17:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- True, and those that mess it up can be banned or something? If it was on purpose I guess.. Anyway that's not the main concern. A list gets you a lot of emails, which basicly is my reason (+not enough time) not to subscribe to the d-list. I see the Community Manager more like a forum than a d-list like concept anyway... --Wimpie 19:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
