Difference between revisions of "Talk:Community Manager"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(I would say wiki) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I think that this project would lend itself very well to a team of 2 or 3 people. Definitely one lead Manager and perhaps one or two assistants/deputies. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 02:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | I think that this project would lend itself very well to a team of 2 or 3 people. Definitely one lead Manager and perhaps one or two assistants/deputies. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 02:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Much like we discussed on the dev list already. I made the decision to have '''one''' community manager, because the position needs a "face", but he should have 1-2 people who support him and help out when he's on holiday, etc. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 15:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | :Much like we discussed on the dev list already. I made the decision to have '''one''' community manager, because the position needs a "face", but he should have 1-2 people who support him and help out when he's on holiday, etc. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 15:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | == Wiki or list? == | ||
| + | Excellent idea, but would it be placed on this wiki, or some sort of list? I guess it'll be wiki, but won't it be difficult to communicate that way? 'Cause everyone can just edit a page etc. --[[User:Wimpie|Wimpie]] 18:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I would say wiki, because it's easier to organize and browse. It's true that any user can edit a page but the wiki does keep a record of edits. If the page gets messed up, the CM can figure it out pretty quick and fix it. --[[User:Squirrel|Squirrel]] 17:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:14, 2 July 2009
Sounds like an excellent idea to me...Do we have any volunteers for the position?
Small Team?
I think that this project would lend itself very well to a team of 2 or 3 people. Definitely one lead Manager and perhaps one or two assistants/deputies. --Indirik 02:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Much like we discussed on the dev list already. I made the decision to have one community manager, because the position needs a "face", but he should have 1-2 people who support him and help out when he's on holiday, etc. --Tom 15:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Wiki or list?
Excellent idea, but would it be placed on this wiki, or some sort of list? I guess it'll be wiki, but won't it be difficult to communicate that way? 'Cause everyone can just edit a page etc. --Wimpie 18:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- I would say wiki, because it's easier to organize and browse. It's true that any user can edit a page but the wiki does keep a record of edits. If the page gets messed up, the CM can figure it out pretty quick and fix it. --Squirrel 17:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
