Talk:Beluaterran Observer/Issue 2
No mention of daimons occupying Cteduul when RoF declared war, that Avalon looked lost when peace was signed, that RoF also had another realm, Valhus, help on the gang bang? Nice job painting Avalon and Enweil as a bunch of greedy bastards. -Chénier 20:02, 2 November 2010 (CET)
- Which, of course, is an accurate portrayal. Vellos 21:58, 2 November 2010 (CET)
- Or rather, a gross oversimplification and misunderstanding of motives and context. -Chénier 00:10, 3 November 2010 (CET)
- You can find more details about Enweil's entrance into the war from this Republic of Fwuvoghor/The Enweil Situation. If you think Enweil is greedy with just the information you've got, wait till you see this. Ceorl 05:45, 3 November 2010 (CET)
- Nothing about greed there. We just really didn't like you, and considered your rule illegitimate. -Chénier 06:49, 3 November 2010 (CET)
- You can find more details about Enweil's entrance into the war from this Republic of Fwuvoghor/The Enweil Situation. If you think Enweil is greedy with just the information you've got, wait till you see this. Ceorl 05:45, 3 November 2010 (CET)
- Or rather, a gross oversimplification and misunderstanding of motives and context. -Chénier 00:10, 3 November 2010 (CET)
Heh, well, didn't take long for this paper to lose any credibility it started with. The latest article is completely biased against Enweil, reporting only for one side, misrepresenting facts, and poorly understanding the roots of the wars. May as well be called the "Anti-Enweil Observer" instead. -Chénier 13:19, 3 November 2010 (CET)
- I'm sorry you dont like it Chénier. We gathered information for a long time before starting the article, and invited people to share the reports they had. Anyway, you should read our disclaimer again, and of course, if you have facts to dispute, they are welcome. As far as I know, everything in the article itself is true, and I am investigating what you say below. If its found to be false, it will be removed. Beluaterran Observer 15:50, 3 November 2010 (CET)
Taking Fwuvoghor
"Enweil declared war after its forces entered the city gates under the guise of neutrality": That's a lie. Enweil declared war on Fwuvoghor before entering the city. *Riombara* is the one to have no declared war in time to defend the city, having only one or two nobles arrive at the same time as Enweil and the rest of their army arriving a turn too late. Riombara is to blame for battle not taking place, but since their army was too late it wouldn't have changed anything, the RoF forces present when Enweil's armies arrived were ridiculously small, and purely militia. The walls would have been overtaken with ease. -Chénier 12:51, 3 November 2010 (CET)
