Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Realms of Atamara"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Foreign Curs (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:There is no need. Not only are lost realms ''emphasised'' but the realms are listed in alphabetical order from 'A' after the extant realms - [[User:Revan|Revan]] 21:17, 15 February 2007 (CET) | :There is no need. Not only are lost realms ''emphasised'' but the realms are listed in alphabetical order from 'A' after the extant realms - [[User:Revan|Revan]] 21:17, 15 February 2007 (CET) | ||
:Still, the point of a template is to make things clearer with styles and borders. If you want to use Italic to make it clear you shouldn't even bother to make a template. Since there is a template, use it fully otherwise it's kinda wasted effort. [[User:Foreign Curs|Foreign Curs]] 22:33, 15 February 2007 (CET) | :Still, the point of a template is to make things clearer with styles and borders. If you want to use Italic to make it clear you shouldn't even bother to make a template. Since there is a template, use it fully otherwise it's kinda wasted effort. [[User:Foreign Curs|Foreign Curs]] 22:33, 15 February 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | ::In that case I'd like to suggest a compromise: that both categories be restricted to two columns in size, the number of rows really doesn't matter if it makes it easier to read as a template. --[[User:Bannable|Bannable]] 23:02, 15 February 2007 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 00:02, 16 February 2007
I'd suggest you put a line between lost realms and existing realms. Now it's kinda guessing which realms belong to chich category if you don't have any historical knowledge about Atamara... Foreign Curs 21:02, 15 February 2007 (CET)
- There is no need. Not only are lost realms emphasised but the realms are listed in alphabetical order from 'A' after the extant realms - Revan 21:17, 15 February 2007 (CET)
- Still, the point of a template is to make things clearer with styles and borders. If you want to use Italic to make it clear you shouldn't even bother to make a template. Since there is a template, use it fully otherwise it's kinda wasted effort. Foreign Curs 22:33, 15 February 2007 (CET)
- In that case I'd like to suggest a compromise: that both categories be restricted to two columns in size, the number of rows really doesn't matter if it makes it easier to read as a template. --Bannable 23:02, 15 February 2007 (CET)
