Difference between revisions of "Talk:Family Pages/old2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:--[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 4 August 2005 16:36 (CEST) | :--[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 4 August 2005 16:36 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | We definitely need a sort order that doesn't change all the time, which rules out fame, guild or realm memberships. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Alphabetical is something that we don't have to set up - if everyone puts his family page into a "families" category, we get that for free as an added bonus. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 4 August 2005 20:47 (CEST) |
Revision as of 20:47, 4 August 2005
/old version of this page
How to divide it up
The question still remains as to how to divide the page up.
We need some kind of structure, because a list of a hundred or more names just isn't something that is useful.
Let's sum up the structures that were proposed:
- By number of rulerships
- By a self-assessment of fame (as shown on the page at the moment)
- By home island
What other ideas can we come up with? Let's do a little brainstorming. No criticising, just collection of thoughts, then we have fun shooting them down, ok?
--Tom 4 August 2005 11:22 (CEST)
- Hmm. How about:
- Straight-up alphabetical order
- Guild memberships or other (less formal) associations
- Favorite class
- Home island and home realm
- Length of time in game
- By region (I'm thinking something like the Domesday Book here)
- Actual numerical fame value (We should probably have a "famous families" page for that, anyway)
- --Dolohov 4 August 2005 16:36 (CEST)
We definitely need a sort order that doesn't change all the time, which rules out fame, guild or realm memberships.
Alphabetical is something that we don't have to set up - if everyone puts his family page into a "families" category, we get that for free as an added bonus.
--Tom 4 August 2005 20:47 (CEST)