Difference between revisions of "Talk:Inalienable rights"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DorianGray (talk | contribs) m (comment - placement) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::We had the same problem with stubs - should these go at the top or bottom of pages? They are more important than stub messages, but might break up the page. [[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 27 July 2005 11:58 (CEST) | ::We had the same problem with stubs - should these go at the top or bottom of pages? They are more important than stub messages, but might break up the page. [[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 27 July 2005 11:58 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I'd say that they are probably important enough to break up the page. They're suppose to stand out, so that no one can claim "I didn't know." -- [[User:Nicholas|Nicholas]] July 27, 2005 18:44 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 27 July 2005
the list isn't really complete, I know I've forgotten a few, someone please add them. Also you can add a template to pages using the code:
{{Inalienable rights|description of the right}}
It will end up looking like:
Be aware that mulus in silva ambulat is one of a noble's inalienable rights in Battlemaster. Anyone who gives you orders about mulus in silva ambulat should be reported to the Titans or Magistrates.
--Nicholas July 26, 2005 20:50 (CEST)
- Excellent! --Tom 27 July 2005 09:30 (CEST)
- We had the same problem with stubs - should these go at the top or bottom of pages? They are more important than stub messages, but might break up the page. DorianGray 27 July 2005 11:58 (CEST)
- I'd say that they are probably important enough to break up the page. They're suppose to stand out, so that no one can claim "I didn't know." -- Nicholas July 27, 2005 18:44 (CEST)
