Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hierarchy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Shoenaemaeh (talk | contribs) m |
House Olik (talk | contribs) m (stamp o' approval) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I like the idea...reminds me of how Crusader Kings worked , it is basicly the same. | I like the idea...reminds me of how Crusader Kings worked , it is basicly the same. | ||
| + | :I like it too, because it would seem to breathe life into a function right now that doesn't have too much purpose. And I always thought feudal ranks should mean something more in this game. [[User:House Olik|Olik]] | ||
Well, in part the idea is actually a good one, but in my opinion this would benefit much the same people and it would be difficult to change position (this system actually goes fully against the democracy and republic system...) | Well, in part the idea is actually a good one, but in my opinion this would benefit much the same people and it would be difficult to change position (this system actually goes fully against the democracy and republic system...) | ||
Revision as of 18:11, 8 May 2006
I like the idea...reminds me of how Crusader Kings worked , it is basicly the same.
- I like it too, because it would seem to breathe life into a function right now that doesn't have too much purpose. And I always thought feudal ranks should mean something more in this game. Olik
Well, in part the idea is actually a good one, but in my opinion this would benefit much the same people and it would be difficult to change position (this system actually goes fully against the democracy and republic system...)
