Talk:Volcanic Hot Newsletter/January '07 issue

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Carelia's ban on infiltrator attack

Concerning the claim that Carelia's actions may have been a jab at Redspan's, I highly doubt it. It's been an unwritten rule on Atamara for as long as I remember that rulers are not to be the target of infiltrator attacks, even if at war. No one else gets such immunity. - Filador

From a curious observator, it may be intriguing to note how different rulers respond to the same situation. Kronos said, "As I said, we handle our cases as we wish others to do." Interpret it how you will. Jezralhm 10:03, 8 January 2007 (CET)
Funny that I've been playing on Atamara for over 3 years and that's the first I hear that there's some unwritten rule that rulers are not to be stabbed :) As far as I'm concerned, any noble in a realm you're at peace with is off limits and violators should be met with a ban, but that's just me. - LilWolf 11:09, 8 January 2007 (CET)
The reason you have only just heard of it is because it dosen't happen very often. I remember one time when an infil successfully attacked a ruler (during war) and that nearly brought down half of the continent on that one realm. You only have one or two cases like this, usually some new guy who dosen't know the rules, or an opportunist that thinks he can take his chances. Then again on the other hand if you have some one like "The One" who claims to be a ruler, but actually isn't, then the rule is usually wavered. ScottSabin 11:41, 8 January 2007 (CET)

Hostilities

Was Darka at peace with Redspan? I had thought they never got above neutral. - Filador

Darka has been at war with RedSpan since November 17th (see this). Jezralhm 22:02, 16 January 2007 (CET)
At the time AJ stabbed Mr_Jones, Darka and RedSpan were at peace. Relations deteriorated since then. - LilWolf 23:26, 16 January 2007 (CET)
The current war has failed to generate any of the heat noted in Darkanism. One might even call it a cold war. Darka is apparently waiting until someone else decides to fund their adventure, deeming honour not enough reason to actually carry out a war. --Habap 00:16, 17 January 2007 (CET)
Debating with anyone from RedSpan is getting quite old already. You have your own twisted view that isn't going to change in any direction no matter what I or anyone else says. I suggest you stop your useless propaganda war or at least keep it out of the talk pages of this newspaper. - LilWolf 13:03, 17 January 2007 (CET)
At least we are prepared to actually fight a war, even if it is for Propaganda. ScottSabin 15:18, 17 January 2007 (CET)
All I'm going to say is: NEVER EVER let your guard down, because the moment you do, green-and-gold banners will appear over the horizon, and your regions' population will be... downsized. -Pizarro
You knwo what, im getting bored of that line. Its the only line you actually use. Why dont you come and put your money where your mouth is, and actually come down here to face us? ScottSabin 15:45, 17 January 2007 (CET)
Well, because apparently, your guard is still up. If it were up to me, I'd wait several years, until you goat herders have grown so arrogant that you think the Darkans fear you and your leaders have lulled you into a false sense of security. It's much more entertaining to sneak up on your target when it has no idea you're coming, and then destroy it completely. You'll see what I mean eventually. In the meantime, please, by all means, keep believeing we fear you. It will make the slaughtering all the more fun for us. -Pizarro
Pizarro, you have your own false sense of security. And when your fake window is shattered, it will not be done for "entertainment," but because we are Just, we are Honourable, we are Noble - in other words, everything you are not. And unlike in your hypothetical situation, ours has a much greater chance of occurring. We've defeated Darka's forces when we were busy with the armies of several other realms at once. How well do you think you'll fare against us when we can focus our attention and might upon you? You will crumble to our might, just as your arguments crumble in the face of reason. So my word to you, little one, is to not speak for your "king" or your "kingdom," or when it all falls down on your heads, every one of your countrymen will know that it was your flapping tongue that brought the victorious to wreack havoc upon all that you once thought so invulnerable.House Olik 19:21, 17 January 2007 (CET)
You see thats the difference between Darka and the rest of the Continent. We will fight our enemies when they know we are there. We dont go round sneaking and doing the unerhand thing. We have honour to fight for. You aparently only like to see our backsides...much lieke Rosengarden Guy. ScottSabin 17:00, 17 January 2007 (CET)
I find it a fitting retribution. AJ attacked Mr_Jones in his sleep, it's only normal that we repay the favour. And as long as we're debating honor, I distinctly recall your government taking AJs prize gold for themselves, under the guise of 'punishment'. Gold that was gained through assassinating a man in his sleep. Yes, honor... -Pizarro 17:27, 17 January 2007 (CET)
That argument is floored in several places. 1: you have already done what AJ did, except where he succeded, you didnt, we cuaght both of your infils. One attacked me...i could have told KK, to ban him due to code (see above), but i didnt. 2: If Mr Jones was as innocent as you say, then how does an innocent man get a 600 gold bounty on his head? ScottSabin 17:37, 17 January 2007 (CET)
Simple, there are many people who don't like him, most likely his bounty was set by members of the Southern Federation. Does that make him a criminal by default? And for the record, I never said he was innocent either. As for assaulting goat herders, do you honestly think we would have declared war on you if we were aiming for an equal return? Quite the contrary, we will burn, destroy and kill until WE think it's enough.-Pizarro
Ah yes, until you think is enough.....ah...just like the 1200 gold you tried to extort from us? Ah...now i get your logic...do it until it get bored, then say to the world...look at me i can rape peasnts! Whoo Im a big man now! ScottSabin 17:51, 17 January 2007 (CET)
What kind of punishment would a simple return of the gold have been? It's not like AJ stole a few pieces of gold, he assassinated our Royal Treasurer, and collected gold that was paid by you and your friends. He acted out of sheer greed. We merely responded in an appropriate manner. And your peasants would have been safe if you had simply paid up. Besides, your peasants will be safe if you can stop us before we get to them. If you can't... well, perhaps their leaders should have tried harder to protect them. Vae victus. Woe to the vanquished! My favorite proverb ever.-Pizarro 17:59, 17 January 2007 (CET)
And why should Redspan pay you the money that is not yours? It is not Mr_Jones money, as you said it was paid by me and my friends. So why would we have to pay you a single gold coin? You didnt do any work to get to that money, and your doing none now. Darka thinks it can get money by doing nothing and forceing others to pay it to them. Things dont work that way in life. You have to do a lot of work to get a little out of life...try it once in a while. ScottSabin 18:15, 17 January 2007 (CET)
Why should you pay? Because one of yours committed a crime against one of ours! Does the concept us 'justice' mean nothing to you people? Besides, we wouldn't have asked for a single coin, if you had simply punished AJ for his actions like we asked you to. You chose to decline that request, so we gave you an alternative, which you chose to decline as well. So you can't say we didn't offer you an 'easy' way out. -Pizarro 18:53, 17 January 2007 (CET)
And why did AJ attack the Royal Treasurer? Because he had a bounty of 600 gold on his head! How did he get that bounty? By doing something that people didn't like. It's not like there are many people who would or even can just up and decide to put 600 gold towards a bounty on a person for kicks. As I gather, Mr_Jones was a ruler of Darka and was even protested out of office. He did something to earn that bounty, and indirectly did something to earn a knife in his chest. Redspan does not recognize AJ's actions as a crime that should require the entire realm to suffer. The demanded price of repayment is more than a third of Redspan's weekly tax collection, and to force an entire realm to pay that much for the actions of a noble who is not in a leadership position is absurd. If Darka is not happy with the reparitions that Redspan made, they can back up their words and enforce their demands instead of continuing to point fingers and sling mud. - Filador 13:32, 17 January 2007 (EST)
So if I understand you correctly, if we were to pool some gold, place a 600 gold bounty on your King and subsequently plant a dagger in his ribcage, you would simply accept it? After all, we don't like Tony one bit, and he tried to destroy one of our clients, which ultimatly hurts our income. You people make me laugh. And as I said before, we didn't want gold at first, we simply wanted to have AJ punished, hardly a punishment that would damage your realm. Your government refused, and it was then and only then that we demanded monetary compensation. And AJ isn't 'just' an infiltrator either. He served as banker, judge and general. If you can't keep a leash on your nobles, and they do something naughty for which they are not punished... you shouldn't be surprised that we are a bit ticked off. -Pizarro 19:50, 17 January 2007 (CET)
We would accept it as standard Darkan operating practice. You are cowards who attack only when you can do it from ambush. And you are mercenary thugs who would sell your own mothers, if you had any, for a piece of gold. The fact remains your cause for war is unjust. You don't like another realm's judicial decision - big deal. If every realm used this as a cause to declare war on another, every realm would be at war with every other realm. And not one of these wars would be just. Speak to your strengths - mindless barbarianism and empty threats. Your political and judicial arguments carry no weight and serve only to harm the already-poor opinion Atamara has of Darka.House Olik 20:35, 17 January 2007 (CET)
No. I already mentioned the ruler amnesty thing...But say, for example, if you were to get terribly upset with High Marshal Dielo (my character), place a bounty on his head, and he got stabbed by an Estonian, that would not be grounds to declare war on Eston, and I would be quite insistent that a war not be started for that reason. Even though the realms are at peace, Dielo would have done something to deserve it. The fact that AJ has served in all but one type of position in our realm is even more grounds for us to not ban him. He is one of the most respected Redspanians, and is indeed the most senior member of Redspan, and I for one would let Darka destroy Redspan completely before dreaming of banning AJ for such an offense. He was punished for his actions. It is no little thing to collect such a huge bounty, and we gave him the honour of keeping at least a small amount of it. And I'm not surprised that you're ticked off. I'm just surprised that all great and wonderful Darka doesn't have the ability to deal with an infiltrator attack, or to act on their words. - Filador 17:09, 17 January 2007 (EST)

Enough talk

I suspect Mr_Jones and his accomplices committed a crime against someone else. The only way they saw that they could punish him was by placing a bounty on his head. 600 gold is no small bounty. No one need be afraid of Darka. You are weak and impotent. AJ struck down your Royal Treasurer and two months later you have still done nothing. We've heard enough nonsense from the cowards in Darka. If you want to come down to RedSpan like men instead of hiding in Darka like dogs, do so. Otherwise, enjoy my favorite phrase... sic semper tyrannis. --Habap 20:17, 17 January 2007 (CET)

I agree. Enough talk. So shut up already! This is getting annoying on an OOC level because your pointless propaganda discussion fills up talk page after talk page. - LilWolf 21:12, 17 January 2007 (CET)
Of course, free discussion is great. But we're chasing tails in this debate. Agreed, move on. Just next time you propose silence, lets not finish with insults; it does nothing to stop the anger (weak, impotent, done nothing). Jezralhm 01:13, 18 January 2007 (CET)
But I speak only truth. You declared war two months ago and have done nothing. We are quite anxious to resolve the issue and you continually tell us how you will beat us into the ground. We simply want the playground bully to resolve the matter. If you aren't ever coming, I would be satisfied if Darka simply revoked their declaration of war in admission of its impotence. --Habap 14:07, 18 January 2007 (CET)
Now the war has started. Excellent. The dispute can be settled on the battlefield! --Habap 22:46, 25 January 2007 (CET)

Format

(OOC) Can I just say, I like the format of your paper. The headlines are very distinctive and everything looks very neat and organized. --Habap 00:17, 24 January 2007 (CET)

Just to add more OOC praise. Crescent's comments about giving goats a volcano bath made me chuckle :) - Revan 00:41, 24 January 2007 (CET)

Smothering trail

So, the trail itself will smother Darkan troops and their allies? Wow, I had no idea Da Great Goat was so powerful. --Habap 17:38, 26 January 2007 (CET)

I question your insult. The "smothering trail" is a reference to the burning of the RedSpan lands by the hands of Darka and her allies. Once the rampant destruction of regions is complete, there will be no lifeblood left for RedSpan to drain. Thus, the use of the adjective, smothering. The sentence is structured as is, without reference or inclination to "smother Darkan troops" - that is in fact, changing my use of the word completely, into a verb, not written.
If you were to say, the RedSpan men of Da Great Goat were the cause of the trail and to drive out "Darkan troops and their allies" you would also be saying that the RedSpan men of Da Great Goat are:
  • (smother n. 1. A confused multitude of things) an uncontrolled mob of ungainly irregulars
  • looting RedSpan lands
  • (def:) "conceal or hide" -ing in your own lands.
  • dead (asphyxiated, oxygen deprivation) - (this final is certain. The rest are verbs.)
Jezralhm 01:05, 27 January 2007 (CET)
Your "destruction" is nothing but temporary. It is as temporary as your raping and killing in Abington. We are stronger than ever today, and the only thing you ever accomplished with that was indulging in pointless barbarianism. You prove nothing by it, you gain nothing by it, and in the end you only draw all attention to the fact that Darka is an illegitimate realm of subhuman criminal scum. Even you realize that Abington will drive you back, and I can guarantee that whatever "nobles" of yours we capture will suffer greatly at my hands; whatever common soldiers of yours we capture, I will execute. The lifeblood you will be draining here is not Redspan's, but Darka's. House Olik 01:42, 27 January 2007 (CET)
Hear, hear! For Da Federation! Elenar 06:02, 27 January 2007 (CET)
I assumed you intended to write "smoldering trail". "Smothering" is used as an adjective in your sentence, not as a noun.
smothering, adjective
causing difficulty in breathing especially through lack of fresh air and presence of heat; "the choking June dust"; "the smothering soft voices"; "smothering heat"; "the room was suffocating--hot and airless"
If you'd used it as a noun, I could understand your disdain for comment, but you did not, leaving me confused as to why you'd ramble about the meanings of smother as a noun. --Habap 16:47, 27 January 2007 (CET)
While I love language debates, this is kind of stupid. Smother as a noun means: 1. A confused multitude of things or 2. A stifling cloud of smoke. As a verb it's definition is grander. I never intended to use any derivatives of "smother" as a noun, merely pointing out when you misquoted me ("So, the trail itself will smother Darkan troops and their allies? Wow, I had no idea Da Great Goat was so powerful."), you may have intended it to be so. "Smothering" can only be confused as a verb or an adjective. Therefore, I cannot use smothering as a noun. As for apparent disdain within previous comment, you misquoted me to propagate personal agenda. So I defend what I say.
Of course, I do acknowledge your presence trolling these talk pages as to merely provoke a response. So apologies for my part for even exuding effort to retort. Jezralhm 03:58, 28 January 2007 (CET)

Debate

Well,well,everytime there s a discussion for Darka ,Gauihu is around.No matter if the war is against his pitfull realm or not,he always must mark the conversation with his name.Gauihu how much do you get paid in order to throw propaganda against Darka i wonder.Now calm down good goats.You ve being whining about Darka not coming for like what?1 month?You whined in all your allies asking for help and thus we decided to visit you when ready since you made this a war including foreign realms.Now we re there,you whine again because we came.Not that i m surprised of course...I mean you are goats afterall...But just stop talking and whining and start fighting.That may as well save you.Pay the gold that equals the action of your infiltrator AJ or ban AJ and give an end to it.You don t want to...Fine..continue fighting like men the least...stinky smeely men,but men for Sigrid's sake. . Lavigna

Ah, Lavigna, telling people to act like men. Why, because you do? It's always amazed me that you, a woman, tries so hard to defend rape. I guess you have self-loathing. At any rate, you overestimate your importance. If Darka didn't happen to be invading an allied realm and making so much noise about it, I wouldn't be discussing you barbarian scumbags at all. House Olik 21:31, 27 January 2007 (CET)

As for you Gauihu, this oath to kill all Darkans will also result surly in the returned favor for your "kin". So, subhuman or not, I am sure your realm will truly enjoy meeting us in battle if we show the "same" mercy. Each Darkan who dies at your hands will be followed with four Abintonah-whatevers I am sure. If one thing is positive, Darka delivers four punches to the face of the one who dares slap us once. I am not Law Mother or maker of justice, but I can almost assure you "you do not want to bring this war that far". Again dark one, I am one of the few who respect you. Even in war. I speak only in hopes you consider your actions. I welcome an all out execution...but I know many who would find us both insane for welcoming it. The problem here is, I do not head a nation's law and you do. Poor savages. Marshal Vatticus Rexx Vashmere 13:42, 27 January 2007 (CET)

Vatticus, you are a perfect example of everything that is wrong with Darka. You are nothing but a madman, a criminal who escapes justice through sheer luck, and you title yourself "Marshal." Let me clue you in on something, wretch! To be a Marshal one needs an Army, and the forces you lead do not constitute an Army. They are a roving band of degenerate criminals. And, we of Abington already know that Darka has no concept of justice, that they kill whenever they can. So what is this threat you offer of "four punches for every one?" It is worthless! So begone, thou lowly pig-mold! House Olik 21:31, 27 January 2007 (CET)
Lavinga, we would like to fihgt you, but as your fellow nobles have said they will run at the first sight of Abington. We are nto whining that you attacked, we are mearly saying that you cannont even defeat us on your own. You said that you could easily beat us, you are twice as big as us. Now with Tal along that makes it 4 times as big. Not very good for any potential employer i must admit. Oh an the best part you havent even fought our main army, only milita and reserve units. ScottSabin 13:53, 27 January 2007 (CET)
You call the fact that your main army was not there to defend your capital against an attack that you KNEW was coming "the best part"? Your peasants must be proud of their valiant defenders. -Pizarro 15:18, 27 January 2007 (CET)
Just becasue you said you were going to turn up, did not say we knew the attack would be made right there and then. We wernt going to wait around for YOU to show Up When YOU felt like it. ScottSabin 15:23, 27 January 2007 (CET)
And what a good decision that proved to be! -Pizarro 15:25, 27 January 2007 (CET)
Well are goignt o fight you, excpet that you will run away as you have said you will, so enjoy it while it lasts. becasue every TL ythat ends up in my dungeons will pay for their hospitality. ScottSabin 15:32, 27 January 2007 (CET)
Let me just quote some of your countrymen then: "Cowards!" Until you show up with your oh-so-powerful armies, we'll be enjoying ourselves in Stargard. And until you show up, we'll just assume that you're too scared to face us. Sound familiar? -Pizarro 16:08, 27 January 2007 (CET)
From an outsiders point of view - Darka 2, RedSpan 0. --The1exile 16:19, 27 January 2007 (CET)
I will like to remind our gentle readers that I have consistently noted my desire for Darka to come and actually fight the war they declared two months ago. Now that you are here, I shout my joy at the top of my lungs that we can actually fight. I am surprised that you changed your estimation of your own ability to crush us all by yourselves, but I don't mind. As noted, we have friends to help also. I look forward to it.
That said, it does seem odd that you would bang your swords against your shields announcing how you would slaughter our army, but after fighting only militia and reserves (due to admittedly poor planning on our part), you would already begin talking about going home and the inevitability of your defeat. I thought you were all powerful and that your allies would solve the problem of help coming from our Federation. If you leave before we have a chance to engage, I will be sorely disappointed. --Habap 16:54, 27 January 2007 (CET)
Should I laugh? I believe I should... It is remarkable how well you goats take up your first big loss, and consider it as nothing happened, but it remains a loss: Darka has occupied Stargard, capital of RedSpan. If that is only militia and reserves, then I'd be delighted to see what is your real army. For what I've seen in Sullenport isn't much to count on either, and, well, where are your precious friends then? Van Peteghem 21:48, 27 January 2007 (CET)
No, you shouldn't laugh. Having a city occupied for a few days while we're away from home isn't going to bother us. If memory serves, Redspan is the only realm still standing on Atamara that has been reduced to only one region and survived. One attack on our regions without any reduction of realm size really doesn't faze us. Redspan has been gang-banged by five realms at the same time within the last year. At one point, we lost control of five of our nine regions. And yet here we stand today. No, dear Darka, there is nothing short of complete destruction that will reduce the enthusiasm and optimism of Redspan. (And from an OOC point of view, I'm jumping for joy that the Darkans actually made it for a fight). -- Filador 16:10, 28 January, 2007 (EST)


A Letter to the Editor

Dear Crescent - You write, in your completely unbiased, unslandered and wholly-unvarnished Truth Articles, that Abington throws "insults and fake evidence at us just for propaganda issues." I must say, I am amazed you would consider the words of your own King to be "fake evidence," but I suppose that is a matter for you to take up with him personally. Does he not inform you of the blubber which seeps out the corner of his mouth whenever he forgets to close it? As for insults, again, I'm not exactly sure why it's an insult to say that Darka is what it is - a Mercernary Company (not a Realm) - or that it does what it does - rape, burn and pillage. If that seems insulting, I can not apologize for the truth, nor would I simply because you are unwilling to face the facts. As for us being a realm of "cowards," that is simply laughable. We've endured the worst you thugs have had to offer us. We've survived, and we're not impressed by your "superior military." Threaten and bluster all you like. But for gods' sakes, at least have some honesty and take responsibility for what your realm does for once. "Wah, it's not us, we were paid to do it!" or "Wah, it's not us, one of our nobles was poisoned, so we HAVE to rape your peasants! We can't control ourselves, it's not our fault! WAH!" It gets tiring. House Olik 07:23, 28 January 2007 (CET)

And there we get the ethernal whining of Gauihu again. I think your whining is not even worthy of a response. Paradigm 10:25, 29 January 2007 (CET)
Ethernal? Perhaps you meant ethereal. Say, you aren't the editor, are you? No. But thanks for your utterly worthless opinion regardless... always a pleasure to hear from the scum of the earth. House Olik 18:41, 29 January 2007 (CET)
Sir Gauihu, perhaps if you spent more time reading rather than opining, then you would realize that our dear Paradigm is a clergyman while our editor Crescent, is not. 10:59, 30 January 2007 (CET)

Gauihu,i bothered my self enough with you.Indeed you re not worthy of a response but i will give you one because i have a big heart.I told you in the past that we see war differently.I never claimed to be a saint,after the cold death i saw in my homeland when i was a child ,priests killing my people for land and raping in the name of Gods our people,including my mother...i changed my opinion about war.Rape is just another strategy afterall.Everyone kills for gold,power and land.Every war has it s price..You are known for your barbaric actions and for being brutal to your enemies...so i wonder why you re so impressed when you see others acting brutal as well.Darka doesn t ask payment in order to kill with style and nobility...but to kill and in this particular case it s even more.We were verbally attacked by RedSpan with the worse kind of comments and a valuable noble of us was as well assasinated,this time it s also personal.But RS could prevent this by just paying ...No war is gentle,no battlefield looks like merryland...i mean what else?will you ask me why we re using swords and not flowers next?Please...your propaganda is boring and nothing but a bag nonsense. ..Lavigna

Ha! Of course I'm worthy of a response... hence why it seems everyone except the Editor is writing one! And do not lie. You write in another attempt to try to humiliate me in some fashion. But Lavigna, you don't have what it takes. "Verbally attacked by Redspan?" Oh, no! You poor little babies! Pardon me while I, and all Atamara, weeps for your suffering and plight. House Olik 18:41, 29 January 2007 (CET)
I knew I was a good writer, but didn't realize that my writing was a verbal attack that could launch a battalion of murderers and rapists. I just worry that they might run away before I get to test my skills on the battlefield again. --Habap 19:52, 29 January 2007 (CET)
You re simply ridiculous.Yes verbally attacked but above all attacked by their infil in time of peace.It s not a reason good enough for you?Well allow me to say we don t give a damn because it s more than perfect for us.Me trying to humilate you,no ,i rather leave that to you,you already achieved it perfectly,on your own. Lavigna
No, attacked by an infiltrator is not sufficient cause to rape peasants. Nor is "hey, we want to advertise our superior military." Darka rapes and burns at the drop of a hat, using anything as an excuse - anything but the truth. Admit it - you Darkans are just a bunch of desperate men who can only get a woman if they're 1) common-born (like yourselves) and 2) unwilling and 3) foreign. House Olik 19:17, 29 January 2007 (CET)
Oh for the love of Darka,Gauihu,i m not even answering this...What is this "miou,miou,miou,the only way to get women is to rape or find one of your realm...".What other nonsense do you wish to discuss with us today?What s the next attack!Because Darka's troop leaders are ugly!Because Darka's troop leaders are rich and tall ?Pull yourself together Gauihu... Lavigna
If you're not going to answer, why do words continue to seep out the corner of your mouth? Can't you refrain from lying for one second? House Olik 20:00, 29 January 2007 (CET)
Gauihu look at yourself you whine in the paper of a realm you are at war with, why do you think we care for your opinion? Its useless anyway. Admit it - you Gauihu just cant stop whining about everything that doesnt suit you. I think you either 1) extremely arrogant or 2) extremely ignorant or 3) 1 and 2 combined. I suggest you take your polluted words to your own realm. Paradigm 20:01, 29 January 2007 (CET)
I just thought I'd write a letter to the editor. He hasn't, of course, responded, though his darling defenders feel the need to blurt out nonsense at me. If you think that constitutes whining, perhaps you are whining now. Perhaps everyone is whining, always. Perhaps you have rendered the term meaningless, and how? - by whining. "Wah, Gauihu, you're so arrogant!" House Olik 19:16, 30 January 2007 (CET)
Or his own newspaper,maybe that will stop him from infecting ours. Lavigna
Oh believe me, your "newspaper" is quite infected already. It needs no help from me. Though you manage to incourage the contagion yourself, don't you? House Olik 19:16, 30 January 2007 (CET)

Gauihu is the expert on whining...pay no heed to a coward's words lol. IF you do have the luxury of seeing him in battle, blow him kisses, he'll appreciate that. Don't forget the flowers, and be sure to inspect ALL those fleeing a battle, EVEN if they look like civilian women. Gauihu is known to cross-dress to avoid capture...if he ever accidently wanders too far from the Garden and walks into a battle. Doc's Revenge

Ah, Doc's Revenge... reduced to gossip. "Oh that Gauihu!" you cry at every opportunity. Your rage needs a focus, I understand. But remember, it is your mother who stained your family name with her cowardice, treason and criminality. Blame me all you like for stating the truth... it changes nothing about that truth. Anyway, surely you can come up with better slander than "cross-dresser." Perhaps you could call me a doo-doo head? House Olik 07:21, 31 January 2007 (CET)
My point is clearly made...pay no heed to a Coward's words, fellas. This wasn't a cry, it was a statement you worm. Yep, what are you going to do? That's right...nothing. Now hush and let the warriors fight in peace. Doc's Revenge
Oh, it was a cry. Again, I've denied you your only chance to achieve some sort of "victory" over me, and as a result you're a sore loser. Reason has failed you, and your self-proclaimed mastery of the sword awards you nothing, so you try to "hush" me with what apparently works in Fallangard... childish insults. What am I going to do? I am going to be amused when inevitably you reply again with more of the same. But hey, pay no heed to my words if you are able! House Olik 18:36, 31 January 2007 (CET)
"Blame me all you like for stating the truth... it changes nothing about that truth"Oh for Darka's ashbirth...Gauihu it stating the Truth, again!...Gauihu,first Moses,then me and now Doc's Revenge...honestly..you are running out of good lines here.You are repeating the same things over and over again.You accuse others for being liers,dishonourable etc,etc..the only reason you achieve something with it ,is because you just never shut your mouth and spread your nonsense everywhere.For Sigrid's sake ,someone will fall for it right?... Lavigna
No, the reason I achieve something with it is because I happen to be correct. I use reason. I am not simply trying to come up with imaginative insults for people - this isn't a game of "pre-battle taunting" as you and Doc seem to think. I don't need "new lines." The truth will suffice. House Olik 18:36, 31 January 2007 (CET)

The Truth through a worm's eyes: Gaiuhu's story. Go eat more mulch, and let the growups fight the wars...then again, the string of defeats Abington has suffered from are interesting. To be frank, I didn't see ya'll getting your asses handed to you, so, did you wander into battle and infect the army? Or have they been home too long, too close to the likes of a coward like you...that they must purge themselves--once again--from your influence, with death? Maybe the next, fresh, Abby army...will fare better. Their integrity and sense of military duty won't be compromised by the likeness of a little terd like you. How do you like the Dress I sent you? I chose it myself, figured it would look great on you, and who knows, you may even get lucky wearing it hahaha! Doc's Revenge

You see? You can't help yourself. So much rage, so little accomplished. When I said you could call me a "doo doo head," I was being facetious - but I see you've actually taken me up on that and blurted out that I'm a "terd!" That's quite amusing. It's interesting, watching the fall of a so-called great house like Primus... watching you soil yourself with the inane mutterings of an angry child. House Olik 19:04, 31 January 2007 (CET)

You happen to be correct.?..Now the funny thing is that noone else except those goats of your allies ,seem to believe what you have to say.So practically "dearest",it is only your people and goats that believe your so called Truth.You are nothing but a brutal man and you keep pointing your finger to others.You are from those that throw the stone and hide the hand and seconds after that you whine "he did it,he did it..it s the truth".I dunnot intend to taunt you with dresses,honestly i find nothing funny in it.In my life i met women with triple courage than yours and honestly it would be a shame to see you in a dress!Because neither in a woman's dress you can stand proud and honest.You are nothing but a worm Gauihu.The only problem is that you are from those annoying ones,that when you cut them in two you only get 2 worms instead of a dead one.Speaking to you and dealing with you generally, only helps to further infection.Lavigna

So, that begs the question, dearest. Why do you speak to me, if you help further my "infection" in doing so? You seem to want, like two others I could name, to be seen as too superior, too noble to be bothered to talk with me... and yet you are also unable to avoid doing so. So which is to blame; your lack of self-control, or my magnetic personality? House Olik 19:46, 1 February 2007 (CET)
By Sigrid's flames, I never thought I would say this, but Gauhiu is right! We are indeed too superior, too noble to be bothered to talk to him, and so we should no longer speak to him. Sweet dreams, scum! Easy
You already said that before. "I will not be responding, I don't have time to keep responding to childish arrogant fools like you." Yet you did keep responding, just as you are now, and will again in the future. Prove me wrong - perhaps by shutting up you will have the one chance to prove me wrong on something. House Olik 19:59, 1 February 2007 (CET)

A Letter from the Editor

Click the title to continue.