Talk:Republic of Fwuvoghor

From BattleMaster Wiki
(Redirected from Talk:Fwuvoghor)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Irombrozia. Scroll down. We have a Bill of Rights. :D Written by yours truly, Grand Justiciar of Irombrozia. Vellos 02:19, 5 September 2006 (CEST)


Okay, not saying I created the *only* one, but that few have them. --jupo 02:58, 5 September 2006 (CEST)

You said you were, "unique". ;) That implies only, I believe. Vellos 04:05, 6 September 2006 (CEST)

Is it known Retravic will set up a monarchy? Vellos 22:57, 26 March 2007 (CEST)

Yes. And if it's not 100% concrete, then she can change it if she wins. It's definitely known that her aim, or at least that of the rebels in general, is a constitutional monarchy. --The1exile 17:20, 28 March 2007 (CEST)

I like the “people’s republic” idea, the old declarations and codes remain but we are now a monarchy. Perhaps we can expand on this and keep the House of ministers as well. It could lead to some interesting in realm politics.-- TedBauer 12:09 10th of July 2007

people's republic - Like the People's Republic of China? --The1exile 16:30, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

Yes, actually. --Bannable 19:04, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

In Essence retravic is Emperor, she is the de facto ruler of a republic -- TedBauer 17:07 10th of July 2007

Don't be silly people! This is the People's Democratic Republican Queendom of Fwuvoghor. Still haven't figured out where to put "Constitutionnal"... -Chénier 17:53, 10 July 2007 (CEST)
Please stop.--Bannable 19:04, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

when Retravic came to the throne she was doing it to save the republic (from the in realm fighting ;) ). In her manifesto she promised to return Fwuvoghor to a republic after either her death or the end of the war. Really the republic has a Temporary Dictator or Lord Protector. TedBauer 18:50 10th of July 2007

I don't recall ever saying that, do you have a copy of that? --Bannable 19:04, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

No I don't but you called referendum which was voted on by the realm that is what i was refering to.---TedBauer 21:15 10th of July 2007

when Retravic came to the throne she was doing it to save the republic (from the in realm fighting ;) )

D'you know, that could have been done so much easier if she'd actually left instead of using the rebellion to install her preferred government system. And thousands of Fwuvoghorian citizens would still be alive if so. --Widfara, the last Prime Minister.

Why would the only remaining founding member of the realm leave? Its much easier to just exert that reputation.
And thousands of Fwuvoghorian citizens would still be alive if so.
Ah, yes, but they would be under Widfara's will, which was contrary to the established beliefs of the realm. --Bannable 22:53, 10 July 2007 (CEST)
Where monarchy is not contrary to the republican beliefs of the realm... never mind that you consider the beliefs of the realm more important than Tor knows how many lives.... Face it Retravic this is a power trip for you and nothing more. I don't mind that you did it, merely that you try to pretend it was anything different. Widfara
Not at all, Widfara. There is no oppression. All who come as friends are welcome. All religions are accepted within our borders. The form in which the beliefs are enforced has changed, but that is it. The more stable monarchy was choosen so that those who know those beliefs best can serve the Republic for as long as possible, to ensure they are not forgotten. Retravic
So...you had to destroy Dirrik's ideals to save them? --Anaris 15:01, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
No such thing took place. Retravic
Gentlemen, please, can't you give my wife a break? She did as she thought best, she had the support of a substantial part of the realm, and there haven't been any rebellions or insurgencies since... I'm not even aware of any heated opposition going on in RoF... since it become a monarchy it has had more internal peace, harmony, unity, and brotherhood than ever before. A republic has the power to vote it'sown demise: and that voting can only be done on the battlefield. Vellos 21:07, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

I agree Retravic had my support then and has had it ever since, I was thinking that now that we have put much of those problems behind us it is time to bring some of the old ways back into the peoples republic like bring back the House of Ministers for instance. – --TedBauer 21:49, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Incase anyone was ignoring the obvious, The mayor thing retravic changed, was the destruction of RoF's wall, the annialation of its milita and the killing of over half the city's population. If Wildfara was allowed to stay as a ruler, the ECA wouldn't have attacked the city. And then you might have been able to fight of that Deamon army that sack your city recently. So while you might have a better internal regulation, in th end you got screwed when you let this rebbelion happen..--Pelgrims 23:12, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Titles

Only two rulers had actual "official" titles. Dirrik, though little-used (actually, I don't recall him being ever mentioned during my stay there, so...), and Jean-Olivier, who had his nickname of "The Mad" popular across the continent and beyond. Besides this, Jean-Olivier (and his successor, Nicolas, to a lesser extent) were the only ones to really use titles to designate others. Felmoure was commonly referred to as "The Cripple" in public letters, as was Mordred as "The Usurper". Ben earned the title of "Indecisive" through similar means, but through private letters only. The validity of the rest is pretty negligible, though... -Chénier 04:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Maybe a section can be done to record the titles from both perspectives? This way some history can be saved but without favoring one side over the other. --Vita Family 03:37, 24 May 2009 (UTC)