User talk:Dikki

Edits on Vlaanderen's newpaper page

I have no idea who you are, or if you were given any kind of authorization, but generally it is scorn upon to add content to one's signed work, it makes it looks as if he wrote it, and can generally be seen as impersonation. Now, I don't see any harmful content or anything, I'm just saying (and hope you have been given authorisation to remove the newspaper's last entry, otherwise that could be seen as vandalism). -Chénier 17:33, 4 March 2007 (CET)

RE:Edits on Vlaanderen's newpaper page

Valhalla, High Marshal of Vlaanderen. Is that permission enough for you?

So now that you have an idea of who I am you will obviously know I have authorization.

but generally it is scorn upon to add content to one's signed work

In the interest of RP Valhalla removed it. Before the paper is sent out it obviously has to go through certain stages to ensure it does not speak falsly of Vlaanderen principles, that particular article showed the principles of one man, not the realm, so it was removed and Enzeru received a rather angry message from Valhalla (in game of course).

Now, I don't see any harmful content or anything

Of course you dont, your character is not a noble of Vlaanderen. Your characters principles are no doubt different to that of a Vlaanderen noble so it is unlikely you will see much wrong with it but in the interest of RP it can anger many in Vlaanderen.

I'm just saying (and hope you have been given authorisation to remove the newspaper's last entry, otherwise that could be seen as vandalism)

It is good of you to keep check.

Richard (Valhalla)

Hey, this had nothing to do with the IG elements (other that I "watch" Vlaanderen's newspaper, among a few others). I just tend to be suspicious of edits that concern added material in a signed comment and blanking of paragraphs for no apparent reason. -Chénier 18:20, 5 March 2007 (CET)