Difference between revisions of "User talk:Chénier/Industrial BattleMaster"
House Olik (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Have you ever played Paradox's Victoria? If not it's a great look at this age. [[User:Malitia|Malitia]] 23:51, 22 May 2007 (CEST) | Have you ever played Paradox's Victoria? If not it's a great look at this age. [[User:Malitia|Malitia]] 23:51, 22 May 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tom sharing the BM code? haha, I don't think so. But if he did I would be in for more an Ancient era timeframe, myself. It'd be similar to what we have now, but large empires would be more possible, you'd have less powerful cavalry, more important chariots and elephants. I'd romp around like Gilgamesh. word. Good stuff though, nice format. :p [[User:House Olik|House Olik]] 07:14, 25 May 2007 (CEST) | ||
:I Haven't, but it does look interesting. Just looking atthe wiki page gave me a few more ideas. -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 00:13, 23 May 2007 (CEST) | :I Haven't, but it does look interesting. Just looking atthe wiki page gave me a few more ideas. -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 00:13, 23 May 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 07:14, 25 May 2007
I've always thought this would be awseome... ;) - Chénier 23:45, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
- Oh, I've burrowed the formatting from "Undead Battlemaster", by the way. -Chénier 23:47, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
Have you ever played Paradox's Victoria? If not it's a great look at this age. Malitia 23:51, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
Tom sharing the BM code? haha, I don't think so. But if he did I would be in for more an Ancient era timeframe, myself. It'd be similar to what we have now, but large empires would be more possible, you'd have less powerful cavalry, more important chariots and elephants. I'd romp around like Gilgamesh. word. Good stuff though, nice format. :p House Olik 07:14, 25 May 2007 (CEST)
- I Haven't, but it does look interesting. Just looking atthe wiki page gave me a few more ideas. -Chénier 00:13, 23 May 2007 (CEST)
Timeframe
I've given a very wide timeframe, because I wasn't quite sure which one would provide more fun. The victorian era, or the era from 1917-1953, or even until 1991? -Chénier 00:16, 23 May 2007 (CEST)
I'll have to give it some more though as to how this would work... -Chénier 00:26, 23 May 2007 (CEST)
