Difference between revisions of "User talk:Chénier/Industrial BattleMaster"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Timeframe== | ==Timeframe== | ||
I've given a very wide timeframe, because I wasn't quite sure which one would provide more fun. The victorian era, or the era from 1917-1953, or even until 1991? -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 00:16, 23 May 2007 (CEST) | I've given a very wide timeframe, because I wasn't quite sure which one would provide more fun. The victorian era, or the era from 1917-1953, or even until 1991? -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 00:16, 23 May 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Naval and Aerial Warfare?== | ||
| + | I'll have to give it some more though as to how this would work... -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 00:26, 23 May 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 00:26, 23 May 2007
I've always thought this would be awseome... ;) - Chénier 23:45, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
- Oh, I've burrowed the formatting from "Undead Battlemaster", by the way. -Chénier 23:47, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
Have you ever played Paradox's Victoria? If not it's a great look at this age. Malitia 23:51, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
- I Haven't, but it does look interesting. Just looking atthe wiki page gave me a few more ideas. -Chénier 00:13, 23 May 2007 (CEST)
Timeframe
I've given a very wide timeframe, because I wasn't quite sure which one would provide more fun. The victorian era, or the era from 1917-1953, or even until 1991? -Chénier 00:16, 23 May 2007 (CEST)
I'll have to give it some more though as to how this would work... -Chénier 00:26, 23 May 2007 (CEST)
