Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Item Box"
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
: Well, I was trying to fanoodle with the price columns to make it so we could delete the zeros, as I kinda felt they were distracting, but I'm not really happy with it. Its not as space efficient and just looks a bit off. I deleted the zero's on the usable items page, check it and see what you think. Perhaps going back to before I added the "arrow" would be better? --[[User:JFS|JFS]] 22:56, 5 January 2007 (CET) | : Well, I was trying to fanoodle with the price columns to make it so we could delete the zeros, as I kinda felt they were distracting, but I'm not really happy with it. Its not as space efficient and just looks a bit off. I deleted the zero's on the usable items page, check it and see what you think. Perhaps going back to before I added the "arrow" would be better? --[[User:JFS|JFS]] 22:56, 5 January 2007 (CET) | ||
+ | :: It's looking pretty good now -- [[User:Neoro|Neoro]] 02:23, 6 January 2007 (CET) | ||
Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
: There was some suggestion regarding regions, on the old talk page, we can always take it out if need be. [[User:Mcsporran|mcsporran]] 18:01, 5 January 2007 (CET) | : There was some suggestion regarding regions, on the old talk page, we can always take it out if need be. [[User:Mcsporran|mcsporran]] 18:01, 5 January 2007 (CET) | ||
: Well there are probably several items that can only be found in certain areas. Region could be like Rural, Mountains, City, Badlands, All, etc-- [[User:Neoro|Neoro]] 18:11, 5 January 2007 (CET) | : Well there are probably several items that can only be found in certain areas. Region could be like Rural, Mountains, City, Badlands, All, etc-- [[User:Neoro|Neoro]] 18:11, 5 January 2007 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==New Field== | ||
+ | Maybe we should have a field for if this item is useful for a sage. On the same note, the section for the recipes on the theories page could use a similar organization scheme. -- [[User:Neoro|Neoro]] 02:23, 6 January 2007 (CET) |
Revision as of 03:23, 6 January 2007
Convention in price ranges is low-to-high. Also, maybe a small break between those high and low, a dash or a "to". It also looks too blocky, maybe color the text instead of the background. More like:
Item |
|
? |
(Sorry for the ugly code though, I'm not much for wiki or html coding and just had to find something to work) -- Neoro 05:30, 5 January 2007 (CET)
- Well, I was trying to fanoodle with the price columns to make it so we could delete the zeros, as I kinda felt they were distracting, but I'm not really happy with it. Its not as space efficient and just looks a bit off. I deleted the zero's on the usable items page, check it and see what you think. Perhaps going back to before I added the "arrow" would be better? --JFS 22:56, 5 January 2007 (CET)
- It's looking pretty good now -- Neoro 02:23, 6 January 2007 (CET)
Regions
What exactly is the intended purpose of the "region" entry? I don't think it is serving much of a purpose.
Also, instead of providing a low and high price, perhaps we can make a more extensive table that lists just the high price for each region type: mountains, woodlands, badlands, rural, townsland, stronghold, and city? I'll work on an example... --JFS 17:46, 5 January 2007 (CET)
- There was some suggestion regarding regions, on the old talk page, we can always take it out if need be. mcsporran 18:01, 5 January 2007 (CET)
- Well there are probably several items that can only be found in certain areas. Region could be like Rural, Mountains, City, Badlands, All, etc-- Neoro 18:11, 5 January 2007 (CET)
New Field
Maybe we should have a field for if this item is useful for a sage. On the same note, the section for the recipes on the theories page could use a similar organization scheme. -- Neoro 02:23, 6 January 2007 (CET)