Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unit Captain"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Foreign Curs (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Once the knight is released he would meet up with the rest of his troops and captain. | Once the knight is released he would meet up with the rest of his troops and captain. | ||
(Well berhaps some/most of the troops would desert while under the command of the captain, expecialy if they hadnt been payd.)--[[User:Metsamees|Metsamees]] 08:18, 28 May 2007 (CEST) | (Well berhaps some/most of the troops would desert while under the command of the captain, expecialy if they hadnt been payd.)--[[User:Metsamees|Metsamees]] 08:18, 28 May 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | :I only see two (major) problems: First your units does already continue to exist even without captain. They just desert or are hunted. Second, you can't have units twirl around lands without a knight to order them, breaking pacts or causing diplomatic troubles. [[User:Foreign Curs|Foreign Curs]] 09:39, 28 May 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 09:39, 28 May 2007
Me thinks captains could have another use, they could maintain the army if the knight itself is prisoned. Each time im prisoned my troop disapears, me thinks that if im prisoned the captain will take the troop and head for the capital. Once the knight is released he would meet up with the rest of his troops and captain. (Well berhaps some/most of the troops would desert while under the command of the captain, expecialy if they hadnt been payd.)--Metsamees 08:18, 28 May 2007 (CEST)
- I only see two (major) problems: First your units does already continue to exist even without captain. They just desert or are hunted. Second, you can't have units twirl around lands without a knight to order them, breaking pacts or causing diplomatic troubles. Foreign Curs 09:39, 28 May 2007 (CEST)
