|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Is this actually going to have news on it? Why create a page without any content? [[User:AlexTurner|AlexTurner]] 4 October 2005 23:02 (CEST)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==Refreshing==
| |
| − | It's nice to see other newspapers devout to truth and not spreading their opinions. [[User:Jezralhm|Jezralhm]] 05:56, 29 January 2007 (CET)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Thank you for the compliment. We may add an editorial soon though so it may not be unbiased for long. --[[User:Rojo|Rojo]] 02:50, 1 February 2007 (CET)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::At least you're calling it an editorial Rojo. Whereas, ''RedSpan Revealer'' and ''Abington First'' report under the guise of news. -[[User:Jezralhm|Jezralhm]] 11:40, 1 February 2007 (CET)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ''The editorial section below is for newspaper staff only. If you wish to respond to an editorial make a new sub heading. Thank you.--[[User:Rojo|Rojo]] 04:36, 1 February 2007 (CET)''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Actually this Talk page editorial may not work the way I had planned. I may just create a separate page and link it to the newspaper. It could get really complicated, I didn't personally set up this newspaper so I don't really want to fiddle too much. Anyone got any advice? --[[User:Rojo|Rojo]] 19:26, 1 February 2007 (CET)
| |
