Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tara Times"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(comment) |
(advice please) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
''The editorial section below is for newspaper staff only. If you wish to respond to an editorial make a new sub heading. Thank you.--[[User:Rojo|Rojo]] 04:36, 1 February 2007 (CET)'' | ''The editorial section below is for newspaper staff only. If you wish to respond to an editorial make a new sub heading. Thank you.--[[User:Rojo|Rojo]] 04:36, 1 February 2007 (CET)'' | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | Actually this Talk page editorial may not work the way I had planned. I may just create a separate page and link it to the newspaper. It could get really complicated, I didn't personally set up this newspaper so I don't really want to fiddle too much. Anyone got any advice? --[[User:Rojo|Rojo]] 19:26, 1 February 2007 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 20:26, 1 February 2007
Is this actually going to have news on it? Why create a page without any content? AlexTurner 4 October 2005 23:02 (CEST)
Refreshing
It's nice to see other newspapers devout to truth and not spreading their opinions. Jezralhm 05:56, 29 January 2007 (CET)
- Thank you for the compliment. We may add an editorial soon though so it may not be unbiased for long. --Rojo 02:50, 1 February 2007 (CET)
- At least you're calling it an editorial Rojo. Whereas, RedSpan Revealer and Abington First report under the guise of news. -Jezralhm 11:40, 1 February 2007 (CET)
The editorial section below is for newspaper staff only. If you wish to respond to an editorial make a new sub heading. Thank you.--Rojo 04:36, 1 February 2007 (CET)
Actually this Talk page editorial may not work the way I had planned. I may just create a separate page and link it to the newspaper. It could get really complicated, I didn't personally set up this newspaper so I don't really want to fiddle too much. Anyone got any advice? --Rojo 19:26, 1 February 2007 (CET)
