Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sanguis Astroism/Decrees and Declarations/Elder Council Vote on the Conduct of Adam Kabrinski"
m (AbstractLogic moved page Talk:Sanguis Astroism/Elder Council Vote on the Conduct of Adam Kabrinski to Talk:Sanguis Astroism/Decrees and Declarations/Elder Council Vote on the Conduct of Adam Kabrinski without leaving a redirect: This discussion page wasn't moved with the move of the relevant page) |
m (Removed dead link) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This page has been protected for one day due to the counter-productive edit warring. You two need to come together and discuss an actual solution to the problem. If the two of you can not agree to a solution in the next few days then I will decide for you. | This page has been protected for one day due to the counter-productive edit warring. You two need to come together and discuss an actual solution to the problem. If the two of you can not agree to a solution in the next few days then I will decide for you. | ||
| − | My suggestion is to make a section for the rebuttals here on this page. Alternatively a sub-page to this can be made for the rebuttal. However, do not just copy the entire thing and just add comments as a rebuttal. That would essentially be a duplicate page. If a unique text as a rebuttal is crafted then the unique page is viable. The | + | My suggestion is to make a section for the rebuttals here on this page. Alternatively a sub-page to this can be made for the rebuttal. However, do not just copy the entire thing and just add comments as a rebuttal. That would essentially be a duplicate page. If a unique text as a rebuttal is crafted then the unique page is viable. The "Sanguis Astroism/Adam's rebuttal to Elder Council Vote" page should be used if a unique page is the route that the two of you agree to. Do not move the page, I will move it when you are done. This is to suppress the creation of an unnecessary redirect. --[[User:AbstractLogic|AbstractLogic]] ([[User talk:AbstractLogic|talk]]) 17:19, 21 August 2019 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 03:56, 9 September 2019
Page Protected
This page has been protected for one day due to the counter-productive edit warring. You two need to come together and discuss an actual solution to the problem. If the two of you can not agree to a solution in the next few days then I will decide for you.
My suggestion is to make a section for the rebuttals here on this page. Alternatively a sub-page to this can be made for the rebuttal. However, do not just copy the entire thing and just add comments as a rebuttal. That would essentially be a duplicate page. If a unique text as a rebuttal is crafted then the unique page is viable. The "Sanguis Astroism/Adam's rebuttal to Elder Council Vote" page should be used if a unique page is the route that the two of you agree to. Do not move the page, I will move it when you are done. This is to suppress the creation of an unnecessary redirect. --AbstractLogic (talk) 17:19, 21 August 2019 (CEST)
