Difference between revisions of "Talk:SDSA"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Like the policy says its only against Toms rules if you use the game mechanic duelling. Since their is no detail at all at this stage, it is quite possible that is there intent. --[[User:Masdus|Masdus]] 08:37, 7 April 2011 (CEST) | Like the policy says its only against Toms rules if you use the game mechanic duelling. Since their is no detail at all at this stage, it is quite possible that is there intent. --[[User:Masdus|Masdus]] 08:37, 7 April 2011 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Testing Islands have a new "training match" feature, which is seperate from dueling. I presume this will be used. --[[User:Iltaran|Iltaran]] 14:34, 7 April 2011 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 14:34, 7 April 2011
Red Light
I hate to be the bearer of bad news buddy but I, and many others, have already tried this exact same idea before and all of us have been warned against it. For example, Talk:Dwilight Dueling Circuit, and Atamara Dueling Association, and Talk:EIDA. In fact, this policy (found, Rules and Policies) was added to the list because of my last attempt:
- "Duels serious affairs meant to be used to defend one's honor, and may result in character death. They are not for sport or fun. As such, dueling guilds are prohibited if they use game-mechanic duels. Dueling guilds using roleplayed duels are acceptable. "
D.west.ton 05:47, 7 April 2011 (CEST)
Like the policy says its only against Toms rules if you use the game mechanic duelling. Since their is no detail at all at this stage, it is quite possible that is there intent. --Masdus 08:37, 7 April 2011 (CEST)
- Testing Islands have a new "training match" feature, which is seperate from dueling. I presume this will be used. --Iltaran 14:34, 7 April 2011 (CEST)
