Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rumours"

Revision as of 06:33, 27 May 2007

Very good page, but hard to read. Layout could be much improved. --Tom 12:04, 4 January 2007 (CET)

I think the recent change to table format makes it even worse. Too much info crammed into little boxes. Westgate 06:33, 27 May 2007 (CEST)

Revision as of 20:07, 4 January 2007 (view source) The1exile (talk \| contribs) m (Talk:Rumors moved to Talk:Rumours: [[Meta:Style Guide\|# British spelling is the BattleMaster standard. It is "honour", not "honor", for example. If you write an article, at least try. You are free to correct articles from American to British spel) ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:33, 27 May 2007 (view source) Westgate (talk \| contribs) (Eww bad tables) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Very good page, but hard to read. Layout could be much improved. --[[User:Tom\|Tom]] 12:04, 4 January 2007 (CET)		Very good page, but hard to read. Layout could be much improved. --[[User:Tom\|Tom]] 12:04, 4 January 2007 (CET)
		+
		+	I think the recent change to table format makes it even worse. Too much info crammed into little boxes. [[User:Westgate\|Westgate]] 06:33, 27 May 2007 (CEST)