Difference between revisions of "Talk:Redspan Revealer/January Edition 2007"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(nope, it's just reporting) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I'm simply reporting the events your realm has announced publicly that our reader might not otherwise notice. --[[User:Habap|Habap]] 23:01, 18 January 2007 (CET) | :I'm simply reporting the events your realm has announced publicly that our reader might not otherwise notice. --[[User:Habap|Habap]] 23:01, 18 January 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::You fail to account for several things, such as that Fade was revealed to be in the underground by the secret police. You make it out like Lavigna made that up herself while offering absolutely no proof of it. You also make the incorrect assumption that it has something to do with Vatticus getting appointed as Marshal. This was an completely separate incident as these people had been in the underground *before* Vatticus was even appointed. Your reference to Darkanism is completely out of place as Darkanism has nothing to do with the whole incident. These combined with your own personal opinions makes the story a mere propaganda piece and not a news story. - [[User:LilWolf|LilWolf]] 23:22, 18 January 2007 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 00:22, 19 January 2007
Propaganda
Congratulations. Your latest article has made it clear that you are not a newspaper, but a mere propaganda rag. - LilWolf 21:55, 18 January 2007 (CET)
- I'm simply reporting the events your realm has announced publicly that our reader might not otherwise notice. --Habap 23:01, 18 January 2007 (CET)
- You fail to account for several things, such as that Fade was revealed to be in the underground by the secret police. You make it out like Lavigna made that up herself while offering absolutely no proof of it. You also make the incorrect assumption that it has something to do with Vatticus getting appointed as Marshal. This was an completely separate incident as these people had been in the underground *before* Vatticus was even appointed. Your reference to Darkanism is completely out of place as Darkanism has nothing to do with the whole incident. These combined with your own personal opinions makes the story a mere propaganda piece and not a news story. - LilWolf 23:22, 18 January 2007 (CET)
