Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ni'Tessine Family/Corwyn/Archers-vs-Cavalry-Sermbar"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(agreed, not perfect)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Lesson ==
 
== Lesson ==
Ha... would have been a better lesson if the unit was completely slaughtered. In a way, it is sort of beneficial as it took hits and casualties away from the much more important infantry. Everyone know's that the best military plan is to take archers and throw them in front of a charge as a shield! -[[User:Rubyru|Rubyru]] 20:07, 4 December 2010 (CET)
+
Ha... would have been a better lesson if the unit was completely slaughtered. In a way, it is sort of beneficial as it took hits and casualties away from the much more important infantry. Everyone know's that the best military plan is to take archers and throw them in front of a charge as a shield! --[[User:Rubyru|Rubyru]] 20:07, 4 December 2010 (CET)
  
 
: Yeah, it's not a perfect example, I'll grant you that. -- [[User:Corwyn|Corwyn]] 23:25, 4 December 2010 (CET)
 
: Yeah, it's not a perfect example, I'll grant you that. -- [[User:Corwyn|Corwyn]] 23:25, 4 December 2010 (CET)
 +
 +
: Honestly... what else are archers good for. Load them into catapults I say! --[[User:Rubyru|Rubyru]] 01:11, 5 December 2010 (CET)

Latest revision as of 02:11, 5 December 2010

Lesson

Ha... would have been a better lesson if the unit was completely slaughtered. In a way, it is sort of beneficial as it took hits and casualties away from the much more important infantry. Everyone know's that the best military plan is to take archers and throw them in front of a charge as a shield! --Rubyru 20:07, 4 December 2010 (CET)

Yeah, it's not a perfect example, I'll grant you that. -- Corwyn 23:25, 4 December 2010 (CET)
Honestly... what else are archers good for. Load them into catapults I say! --Rubyru 01:11, 5 December 2010 (CET)