Difference between revisions of "Talk:Luz de Bia Chronicles/December Edition"
ScottSabin (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
How do you define "sufficient" damage? The walls are down 2 levels and now at 60+% damage! --[[User:The1exile|The1exile]] 18:56, 11 December 2006 (CET) | How do you define "sufficient" damage? The walls are down 2 levels and now at 60+% damage! --[[User:The1exile|The1exile]] 18:56, 11 December 2006 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The damage can be repaired. Sufficent damage would be if you destroyed all the forts, but seeing how long it took you to get to that level, ti would take you a very long time. [[User:ScottSabin|ScottSabin]] 19:17, 11 December 2006 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 20:17, 11 December 2006
Excuse me, have you seen the state of Mio Dupakithese days? And Glongin? They are in far better shape than they were uder your dominance. Glongin no longer starves, and Mio's stats are through the rof - the people there are already more loyal to us than they were to you! Gorch/--The1exile 23:08, 7 December 2006 (CET)
Riombara started to damage the walls yet again, but could not do any sufficent damage.
How do you define "sufficient" damage? The walls are down 2 levels and now at 60+% damage! --The1exile 18:56, 11 December 2006 (CET)
The damage can be repaired. Sufficent damage would be if you destroyed all the forts, but seeing how long it took you to get to that level, ti would take you a very long time. ScottSabin 19:17, 11 December 2006 (CET)
