Difference between revisions of "Talk:Family Pages/old2"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (clean up)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
It looks a little lengthy and cluttered with just a short veiw of my family history.  I think we should keep it small.  Family name and a character list... maybe character list and number of rulerships.
 
It looks a little lengthy and cluttered with just a short veiw of my family history.  I think we should keep it small.  Family name and a character list... maybe character list and number of rulerships.
  
== Shorter! ==
 
  
Make it '''much''' shorter! 4 lines per family? This is going to be a ''long'' page. I would say one bullet point per family, 2-3 lines '''max'''. And frankly, I don't care how many dukes or judges you had. You can put it on the family page if you like, but there is ''no reason whatsoever'' to included it here. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 2 August 2005 12:53 (CEST)
 
 
== Cool your Jets Tom ==
 
 
Yeah I figured that, I just was showing a look.  It was all a continued thought on what Loren created.  I got busy on other IRL and game things, and forgot to get it shorter.  The first one was like 15 lines =P
 
--[[User:ESP|Eric S P]] 2 August 2005 14:34 (CEST)
 
  
 
== Can we do this better? ==
 
== Can we do this better? ==

Revision as of 23:31, 2 August 2005

Ok the former family page is a bit of a mess. Do we want to have rules on the template of this portal page is to look like? I think Family/Clan name list of characters and a denotation of rulership, deceased, or retired for each character is sufficant. I think alphabetical as well.

I do like Lorens set up however.

Actual history not a good look.

It looks a little lengthy and cluttered with just a short veiw of my family history. I think we should keep it small. Family name and a character list... maybe character list and number of rulerships.


Can we do this better?

There's got to be a better way to organize this page than over rulership. (Nevermind that the "Versatile Families" section is a tad on the self-serving side) Why not organize them by their home island? There could easily be sub-organizations (such as for rulership) and such. --Dolohov 2 August 2005 20:30 (CEST)

Most everyone on EI?

First this was Lorens Idea and it was I that moved everyone (Loren's included) to the Versatile Families. I had to have my arm twisted (mostly by Tom) to even participate in the Tiki. So self servering... sure if that is the way that you want to look at it.

Now Home island is just bad. Unless I completely misunderstand how it works, you have to have X amount of gold in family money and be lucky and watchful to move the family estate and the majority of people that really get into there realm and game don't tend to take from there realm in hours of need, or are on islands that can't send money home if they are able to without hurting there realm.

So even a smaller protion will be able to be on a island that they like and most everyone will be on EI or Atamara. That would suck. If you want rearrange the order and put the Ruling and Versatile Families on the bottom. It is far better than island homes. I will not likely ever go back to EI and that is not representative of my family.

Or Straight alphabetical, I don't care... just Lorens way has a lot more flair, and that is somewhat what the game is about.


Actually, Atamara is the winner in home world count:
+-----------+----------+
| HomeWorld | count(*) |
+-----------+----------+
|      NULL |       25 |
|         1 |      294 |
|         2 |      496 |
|         3 |       41 |
|         4 |       16 |
|         5 |       23 |
|         6 |       87 |
|         7 |       36 |
+-----------+----------+
--Tom 2 August 2005 23:09 (CEST)