Difference between revisions of "Talk:Combat strength"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Perhaps you should include a typical number of soldiers this applies to? I can have elite archers, but at 168 of them, the CS/man is considerably reduced and so the guidelines aren't appli...) |
Von neumann (talk | contribs) (→Assuming thirty men...: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Perhaps you should include a typical number of soldiers this applies to? I can have elite archers, but at 168 of them, the CS/man is considerably reduced and so the guidelines aren't applicable. -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 20:32, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | Perhaps you should include a typical number of soldiers this applies to? I can have elite archers, but at 168 of them, the CS/man is considerably reduced and so the guidelines aren't applicable. -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 20:32, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Assuming thirty men... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Added per Chénier's suggestion. I know little of MI or Archers or SF actually so please feel free to help tweak the chart if you feel it is worthwhile.--[[User:Von neumann|Von neumann]] 21:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:40, 21 January 2010
Perhaps you should include a typical number of soldiers this applies to? I can have elite archers, but at 168 of them, the CS/man is considerably reduced and so the guidelines aren't applicable. -Chénier 20:32, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Assuming thirty men...
Added per Chénier's suggestion. I know little of MI or Archers or SF actually so please feel free to help tweak the chart if you feel it is worthwhile.--Von neumann 21:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
