Difference between revisions of "Talk:BattleMaster Basics"
(Shorter) |
(I hate the create a character section.) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The examples could be slightly reduced, and the wording be tightened. I'm sure we can save about 25% of the text without losing any meaning. | The examples could be slightly reduced, and the wording be tightened. I'm sure we can save about 25% of the text without losing any meaning. | ||
--[[User:Tom|Tom]] 1 August 2005 11:17 (CEST) | --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 1 August 2005 11:17 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == I hate the create a character section. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is very subjective and I would almost disagree entirely with it. EI and Atamara are horrid places to learn the game IMO. Realm Summaries are not a good indicator of the realm at all. Size is an individual preferance. Some thrive in large realms others get lost in in even medium size realms. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think we should link it out to island descriptions and than realm type descriptions. | ||
Revision as of 12:10, 2 August 2005
New Basics Page
What do you all think? The old page is at Introduction. --Dolohov 30 July 2005 23:42 (CEST)
Shorter
I like this very much, but I would love it if it were a little less elaborate. Remember that for the AOL generation anything that doesn't fit on one page is already half a book.
The examples could be slightly reduced, and the wording be tightened. I'm sure we can save about 25% of the text without losing any meaning. --Tom 1 August 2005 11:17 (CEST)
I hate the create a character section.
It is very subjective and I would almost disagree entirely with it. EI and Atamara are horrid places to learn the game IMO. Realm Summaries are not a good indicator of the realm at all. Size is an individual preferance. Some thrive in large realms others get lost in in even medium size realms.
I think we should link it out to island descriptions and than realm type descriptions.
