Difference between revisions of "Talk:Allegiance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
''Likewise, a knight may own allegiance only to the crown, and not to a duke or lord.'' - does this mean that rulers could get the option to have their own knights under them, or is this still the Imperial Knight category? [[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 13:50, 9 January 2007 (CET) | ''Likewise, a knight may own allegiance only to the crown, and not to a duke or lord.'' - does this mean that rulers could get the option to have their own knights under them, or is this still the Imperial Knight category? [[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 13:50, 9 January 2007 (CET) | ||
: No, this is specifically knights sworn to the king and receiving their tax share from the realm taxes. Same will be possible for dukes. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 17:23, 9 January 2007 (CET) | : No, this is specifically knights sworn to the king and receiving their tax share from the realm taxes. Same will be possible for dukes. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 17:23, 9 January 2007 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Just Making Sure == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Shouldn't we get rid of the "''this is a possible feature and may never be included in the game''" thing? --[[User:Shenron|Shenron]] 1:09, March 13 2007 (CET) |
Revision as of 16:05, 13 March 2007
I'm curious as to how this will differ from the oaths system... -Chénier 05:10, 8 January 2007 (CET)
Rulers and Knights
Likewise, a knight may own allegiance only to the crown, and not to a duke or lord. - does this mean that rulers could get the option to have their own knights under them, or is this still the Imperial Knight category? DorianGray 13:50, 9 January 2007 (CET)
- No, this is specifically knights sworn to the king and receiving their tax share from the realm taxes. Same will be possible for dukes. --Tom 17:23, 9 January 2007 (CET)
Just Making Sure
Shouldn't we get rid of the "this is a possible feature and may never be included in the game" thing? --Shenron 1:09, March 13 2007 (CET)